On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:38:48AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:11:12AM +0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:38:48AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:11:12AM +0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:38:48AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:11:12AM +0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:11:12AM +0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >>> If you think these patches constitute a regression,
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:11:12AM +0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
If you think these patches constitute a regression, I can
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 08:38:48AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 07:11:12AM +0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau
On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>> If you think these patches constitute a regression, I can revert them.
>>> However I'd like convincing arguments since
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:09:00PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Willy Tarreau writes:
>
> > RDRAND certainly qualifies as a source of entropy and I judged it was
> > appropriate for a backport for this reason. Nobody has objected about
> > this during the review, but maybe you
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau writes:
> RDRAND certainly qualifies as a source of entropy and I judged it was
> appropriate for a backport for this reason. Nobody has objected about
> this during the review, but maybe you have a different opinion and valid
> reasons for these patches to be reverted ?
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > If you think these patches constitute a regression, I can revert them.
> > However I'd like convincing arguments since they're here to help address
> > a real issue.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Romain,
>
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> > Hi Willy,
> >
> > Willy Tarreau writes:
> >
> > > I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
> >
>
Hi Romain,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
> Hi Willy,
>
> Willy Tarreau writes:
>
> > I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
>
> > This release contains, among others, a number of fixes for random and NTP,
> > including for the
Hi Romain,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu writes:
I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
This release contains, among others, a number of fixes for random and NTP,
including for the NTP leap second bug. Users should
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Romain,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 04:05:32PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu writes:
I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
This release contains, among others, a number of fixes
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
If you think these patches constitute a regression, I can revert them.
However I'd like convincing arguments since they're here to help address
a real issue.
If I
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu writes:
RDRAND certainly qualifies as a source of entropy and I judged it was
appropriate for a backport for this reason. Nobody has objected about
this during the review, but maybe you have a different opinion and valid
reasons for these patches to be
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:09:00PM +0200, Romain Francoise wrote:
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu writes:
RDRAND certainly qualifies as a source of entropy and I judged it was
appropriate for a backport for this reason. Nobody has objected about
this during the review, but maybe
On 10/11/2012 07:31 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 07:58:04PM +0900, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 08:29:16AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
If you think these patches constitute a regression, I can revert them.
However I'd like convincing arguments since they're here
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau writes:
> I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
> This release contains, among others, a number of fixes for random and NTP,
> including for the NTP leap second bug. Users should upgrade.
I'm somewhat surprised to see that it also includes a new feature, namel
Hi Willy,
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu writes:
I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
This release contains, among others, a number of fixes for random and NTP,
including for the NTP leap second bug. Users should upgrade.
I'm somewhat surprised to see that it also includes a new feature, namely
I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
This release contains, among others, a number of fixes for random and NTP,
including for the NTP leap second bug. Users should upgrade.
The patch and changelog will appear soon at the following locations:
ftp://ftp.all.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6
I've just released Linux 2.6.32.60.
This release contains, among others, a number of fixes for random and NTP,
including for the NTP leap second bug. Users should upgrade.
The patch and changelog will appear soon at the following locations:
ftp://ftp.all.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6
22 matches
Mail list logo