Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:14:16PM +0200, Thomas D. wrote: > Hi, > > Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > Greg, any chance you can drop this into the pending 4.1.10? Otherwise people > > will get another broken release. > > For me it looks like the request was too late, the patch is not included > in

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Sat, Oct 03, 2015 at 09:14:16PM +0200, Thomas D. wrote: > Hi, > > Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > Greg, any chance you can drop this into the pending 4.1.10? Otherwise people > > will get another broken release. > > For me it looks like the request was too late, the patch is not included > in

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 10/08/15 18:56, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Eric Dumazet wrote... > > [ commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af ] > >> It definitely should help ! > > Yesterday, I've experienced issues somewhat similar to this, but I'm > not entirely sure: > > Four of five systems running 4.1.9

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Eric Dumazet wrote... [ commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af ] > It definitely should help ! Yesterday, I've experienced issues somewhat similar to this, but I'm not entirely sure: Four of five systems running 4.1.9 stopped working. No reaction on network, keyboard, serial console.

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Eric Dumazet wrote... [ commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af ] > It definitely should help ! Yesterday, I've experienced issues somewhat similar to this, but I'm not entirely sure: Four of five systems running 4.1.9 stopped working. No reaction on network, keyboard, serial console.

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 10/08/15 18:56, Christoph Biedl wrote: > Eric Dumazet wrote... > > [ commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af ] > >> It definitely should help ! > > Yesterday, I've experienced issues somewhat similar to this, but I'm > not entirely sure: > > Four of five systems running 4.1.9

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Hi, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > Greg, any chance you can drop this into the pending 4.1.10? Otherwise people > will get another broken release. For me it looks like the request was too late, the patch is not included in 4.1.10. So don't forget to re-apply the patch when doing the upgrade. Greg,

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Hi, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > Greg, any chance you can drop this into the pending 4.1.10? Otherwise people > will get another broken release. For me it looks like the request was too late, the patch is not included in 4.1.10. So don't forget to re-apply the patch when doing the upgrade. Greg,

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 23:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > What makes sure, that the timer cannot be readded while that timer > > > callback is running? > > > > What is exactly your

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > What makes sure, that the timer cannot be readded while that timer > > callback is running? > > What is exactly your question ? CPU0CPU1 timer expires

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What makes sure, that the timer cannot be readded while that timer > callback is running? What is exactly your question ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte > wrote: > > On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > >> commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af > >> Author: Eric Dumazet > >> Date: Thu Aug 13 15:44:51 2015 -0700 > >> > >> inet: fix

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2015, 09:17:16 schrieb Holger Hoffstätte: > On 10/02/15 08:52, Andre Tomt wrote: > > On 01. okt. 2015 13:52, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte > >> > >> wrote: > >>> On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: > commit

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 10/02/15 08:52, Andre Tomt wrote: > On 01. okt. 2015 13:52, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte >> wrote: >>> On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af Author: Eric Dumazet Date: Thu Aug 13

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 01. okt. 2015 13:52, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af Author: Eric Dumazet Date: Thu Aug 13 15:44:51 2015 -0700 inet: fix potential deadlock in

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 01. okt. 2015 13:52, Eric Dumazet wrote: On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af Author: Eric Dumazet Date: Thu Aug 13

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2015, 09:17:16 schrieb Holger Hoffstätte: > On 10/02/15 08:52, Andre Tomt wrote: > > On 01. okt. 2015 13:52, Eric Dumazet wrote: > >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte > >> > >> wrote: > >>> On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Thu, 1 Oct 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte > wrote: > > On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > >> commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af > >> Author: Eric Dumazet > >> Date:

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 23:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > > > What makes sure, that the timer cannot be readded while that timer > > > callback is running? > > > > What is exactly your

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > What makes sure, that the timer cannot be readded while that timer > callback is running? What is exactly your question ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Fri, 2 Oct 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote: > On Fri, 2015-10-02 at 22:04 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > What makes sure, that the timer cannot be readded while that timer > > callback is running? > > What is exactly your question ? CPU0CPU1 timer expires

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 10/02/15 08:52, Andre Tomt wrote: > On 01. okt. 2015 13:52, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte >> wrote: >>> On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af Author: Eric

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af >> Author: Eric Dumazet >> Date: Thu Aug 13 15:44:51 2015 -0700 >> >> inet: fix potential deadlock in reqsk_queue_unlink() >> >> When

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

p 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: >>>> >>>>> for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux >>>>> 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : >>>> >>>> Congratulations! You're n

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:41:46 +0200, Andre Tomt wrote: > On 01. okt. 2015 00:37, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: >> >>> for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux >>> 4.1.9,

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:43 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 10/01/15 13:29, Eric Dumazet wrote: >> commit 83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af >> Author: Eric Dumazet >> Date: Thu Aug 13 15:44:51 2015 -0700 >> >> inet: fix

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: >>>> >>>>> for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux >>>>> 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : >>>> >>>> Cong

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 06:41:46 +0200, Andre Tomt wrote: > On 01. okt. 2015 00:37, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: >> On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: >> >>> for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux >>> 4.1.9,

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 01. okt. 2015 00:37, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : Congratulations! You're not the first one to get

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: > for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux > 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : Congratulations! You're not the first one to get hit by this, but you are probably the fir

Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Hi, for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [0.00

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: > for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux > 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : Congratulations! You're not the first one to get hit by this, but you are probably the fir

Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

Hi, for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpu [0.00] Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct [0.00

Re: Soft lockup issue in Linux 4.1.9

On 01. okt. 2015 00:37, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 23:59:43 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet wrote: for information, I've just upgraded 6 servers from Linux 4.1.8 to Linux 4.1.9, and have some random soft lockup. If this can help : Congratulations! You're not the first one to get

Linux 4.1.9

face if already configured Florian Westphal (1): netlink: don't hold mutex in rcu callback when releasing mmapd ring Gavin Shan (2): powerpc/pseries: Fix corrupted pdn list powerpc/eeh: Fix fenced PHB caused by eeh_slot_error_detail() Greg Kroah-Hartman (1): Linux 4.1.9 Haggai Era

Linux 4.1.9

face if already configured Florian Westphal (1): netlink: don't hold mutex in rcu callback when releasing mmapd ring Gavin Shan (2): powerpc/pseries: Fix corrupted pdn list powerpc/eeh: Fix fenced PHB caused by eeh_slot_error_detail() Greg Kroah-Hartman (1): Linux 4.1.9 Haggai Era