Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-11-06 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Lo! On 01.11.2016 09:18, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me >> know (simply CC regressi...@leemhuis.info). > Do build regressions count? That's a good question. > Because I was

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-11-06 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Lo! On 01.11.2016 09:18, Paul Bolle wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me >> know (simply CC regressi...@leemhuis.info). > Do build regressions count? That's a good question. > Because I was

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Bolle
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me > know (simply CC regressi...@leemhuis.info). Do build regressions count? Because I was trying to fix an obscure build issue in arch/mips, choose a random

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-11-01 Thread Paul Bolle
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me > know (simply CC regressi...@leemhuis.info). Do build regressions count? Because I was trying to fix an obscure build issue in arch/mips, choose a random

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-31 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 30 2016, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> Desc: PPC32: fails to boot on my PowerBook G4 Aluminum; bisected to >> commit 05fd007e4629 >> Repo: 2016-10-20

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-31 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 30 2016, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >> Desc: PPC32: fails to boot on my PowerBook G4 Aluminum; bisected to >> commit 05fd007e4629 >> Repo: 2016-10-20 https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kerne >>

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-31 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Desc: tpm0: TPM self test failed > Repo: 2016-10-28 > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1259943.html > Stat: 2016-10-28 >

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-31 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 6:20 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Desc: tpm0: TPM self test failed > Repo: 2016-10-28 > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1259943.html > Stat: 2016-10-28 > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg1260452.html >

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-30 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Desc: PPC32: fails to boot on my PowerBook G4 Aluminum; bisected to > commit 05fd007e4629 > Repo: 2016-10-20 https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kerne > l.org/msg1253391.html > Stat: 2016-10-22

Re: Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-30 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Sun, 2016-10-30 at 14:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > Desc: PPC32: fails to boot on my PowerBook G4 Aluminum; bisected to > commit 05fd007e4629 > Repo: 2016-10-20 https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kerne > l.org/msg1253391.html > Stat: 2016-10-22

Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-30 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Hi! Here is my second regression report for Linux 4.9. It lists 14 regressions I'm aware of. 4 of them are new; 3 got fixed since last weeks report. As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me know (simply CC regressi...@leemhuis.info). And please tell me if there is

Linux 4.9: Reported regressions as of Sunday, 2016-10-30

2016-10-30 Thread Thorsten Leemhuis
Hi! Here is my second regression report for Linux 4.9. It lists 14 regressions I'm aware of. 4 of them are new; 3 got fixed since last weeks report. As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me know (simply CC regressi...@leemhuis.info). And please tell me if there is