> > We ran 1.2.13lmp for about 1100 days before the box finally got
> > turned off - twice around the uptime clock and more
> That's must be some kind of unofficial record... I though 400+ days
> was pretty neat, but 1100 says is really impressive, especially on a
> kernel which has races with
We ran 1.2.13lmp for about 1100 days before the box finally got
turned off - twice around the uptime clock and more
That's must be some kind of unofficial record... I though 400+ days
was pretty neat, but 1100 says is really impressive, especially on a
kernel which has races with jiffie
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> I agree that the MTBF can be very misleading...
>
> But put it this way: My server ran 2.2.14 for over 400 days before I
> rebooted it. It was down for about 5 minutes while rebooting (probably
> less).
>
> My NT Server gets a nightly reboot. I
> That's must be some kind of unofficial record... I though 400+ days
> was pretty neat, but 1100 says is really impressive, especially on a
> kernel which has races with jiffie wraps...
It did one job, for several years. Thats when boxes tend to be very stable.
Its also a statistical anomaly
From: "Chris Wedgwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Alan Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> We ran 1.2.13lmp for about 1100 days before the box finally got
> turned off - twice around the uptime clock and more
>
> That's must be some kind of unofficial record... I though 400+ days
> was pretty
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Jim Garlick wrote:
> Can someone point me to MTBF data for Linux? I realize this is kind of
> vague. Ideally I would like MTBF for kernel 2.2.14 running on SMP Alpha,
> but any data is better than nothing. This is to help win an argument to
> put linux on a l
> > Can someone point me to MTBF data for Linux? I realize this is kind of
> > vague. Ideally I would like MTBF for kernel 2.2.14 running on SMP Alpha,
> > but any data is better than nothing. This is to help win an argument to
> > put linux on a large clu
> I'm sure there must be boxes with kernel 1.2.13 out there
> that have been running since 1.2.13 came out...
We ran 1.2.13lmp for about 1100 days before the box finally got turned off -
twice around the uptime clock and more
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On 1 Sep, Jim Garlick wrote:
> Can someone point me to MTBF data for Linux? I realize this is kind of
> vague. Ideally I would like MTBF for kernel 2.2.14 running on SMP Alpha,
> but any data is better than nothing. This is to help win an argument to
> put linux on a large clus
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> Whoops! Think-o. I meant I'm running 2.2.5 for over 400 days.
I'm sure there must be boxes with kernel 1.2.13 out there
that have been running since 1.2.13 came out...
(however, that doesn't mean I would recommend that kernel
to anyone)
regards,
g. They're just mail/www/ftp/dns/login (for linux) servers.
> To a first order approximation, they're basically the same hardware, both
> protected by a UPS.
>
> Matt
>
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2000 at 10:38:54PM +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Jim Ga
:38:54PM +0200, Igmar Palsenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Jim Garlick wrote:
>
> > Can someone point me to MTBF data for Linux? I realize this is kind of
> > vague. Ideally I would like MTBF for kernel 2.2.14 running on SMP Alpha,
> > but any data is better than nothi
Can someone point me to MTBF data for Linux? I realize this is kind of
vague. Ideally I would like MTBF for kernel 2.2.14 running on SMP Alpha,
but any data is better than nothing. This is to help win an argument to
put linux on a large cluster. Thanks in advance.
Jim Garlick
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Matthew Dharm wrote:
Whoops! Think-o. I meant I'm running 2.2.5 for over 400 days.
I'm sure there must be boxes with kernel 1.2.13 out there
that have been running since 1.2.13 came out...
(however, that doesn't mean I would recommend that kernel
to anyone)
regards,
On 1 Sep, Jim Garlick wrote:
Can someone point me to MTBF data for Linux? I realize this is kind of
vague. Ideally I would like MTBF for kernel 2.2.14 running on SMP Alpha,
but any data is better than nothing. This is to help win an argument to
put linux on a large cluster. Thanks
15 matches
Mail list logo
