On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As I already explained in another mail, 2.4.34 builds with gcc-4.1 on x86
and a few other archs. I also explained how to do this :
$ make CC=gcc-4.1
I don't know how I can explain it to you an easier way, but what I'm sure
about is that if
[ CC list trimmed since I'm repeating myself ]
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:49:05PM +0530, Akula2 wrote:
> >> On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I don't see which libs you are talking about. The compiler you build your
> >kernel with is totally independant on the compiler you
> On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't see which libs you are talking about. The compiler you build your
kernel with is totally independant on the compiler you build your apps with.
A few years ago, some distros even shipped a compiler just for the kernel
(they called the
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:41:00PM +0530, Akula2 wrote:
> On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and
> >linux-2.6,
> >> but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I
> >recall
> >>
On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
> but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
> correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while newer
>
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:28:12PM -0600, Steve Brueggeman wrote:
> There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
> but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
> correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while
On 1/5/07, Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
keeping 2 gcc's around usually is just a pain, but might also work.
gcc-4.1.1 might give some problems with some packages and just work fine
otherwise too,
but 3.4.6 has just been known to work all around more.
I am planning in this fashion:-
On 1/5/07, Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
keeping 2 gcc's around usually is just a pain, but might also work.
gcc-4.1.1 might give some problems with some packages and just work fine
otherwise too,
but 3.4.6 has just been known to work all around more.
I am planning in this fashion:-
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:28:12PM -0600, Steve Brueggeman wrote:
There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while
On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while newer
linux-2.6
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 06:41:00PM +0530, Akula2 wrote:
On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and
linux-2.6,
but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I
recall
correctly, one of the
On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see which libs you are talking about. The compiler you build your
kernel with is totally independant on the compiler you build your apps with.
A few years ago, some distros even shipped a compiler just for the kernel
(they called the
[ CC list trimmed since I'm repeating myself ]
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 07:49:05PM +0530, Akula2 wrote:
On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see which libs you are talking about. The compiler you build your
kernel with is totally independant on the compiler you build your
On 1/7/07, Willy Tarreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I already explained in another mail, 2.4.34 builds with gcc-4.1 on x86
and a few other archs. I also explained how to do this :
$ make CC=gcc-4.1
I don't know how I can explain it to you an easier way, but what I'm sure
about is that if you
Renato S. Yamane wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Em 05-01-2007 10:04, Akula2 escreveu:
On 1/5/07, Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Brueggeman wrote:
gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever.
Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Em 05-01-2007 10:04, Akula2 escreveu:
> On 1/5/07, Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Steve Brueggeman wrote:
>> gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever.
>
> Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the distro? Or keep
On 1/5/07, Auke Kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Steve Brueggeman wrote:
Thanks Steve for your inputs.
gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever.
Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the distro? Or keep both?
Most binary distro's won't support this, but I think
I'm not sure I understood your problem correctly.
I see no reason to have two kernel versions on your host system. You can
keep 2.6.x on the host, and compile a 2.4.x for the target. You don't
need to run 2.4.x on your host.
I would like to have 2.4.x & 2.6.x on my host FC6 machine.
But am not
I'm not sure I understood your problem correctly.
I see no reason to have two kernel versions on your host system. You can
keep 2.6.x on the host, and compile a 2.4.x for the target. You don't
need to run 2.4.x on your host.
I would like to have 2.4.x 2.6.x on my host FC6 machine.
But am not
On 1/5/07, Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Brueggeman wrote:
Thanks Steve for your inputs.
gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever.
Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the distro? Or keep both?
Most binary distro's won't support this, but I think
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Em 05-01-2007 10:04, Akula2 escreveu:
On 1/5/07, Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Brueggeman wrote:
gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever.
Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the distro? Or keep both?
I
Renato S. Yamane wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Em 05-01-2007 10:04, Akula2 escreveu:
On 1/5/07, Auke Kok [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Steve Brueggeman wrote:
gcc 3.4.x works great on both 2.6 and 2.4, no issues whatsoever.
Do you mean I need to discard gcc 4.1.x on the
Steve Brueggeman wrote:
There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while newer
linux-2.6 support/prefer gcc-3.? or
There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while newer
linux-2.6 support/prefer gcc-3.? or greater.
At any rate, what
Akula2 wrote:
Hello All,
I am looking to use multiple kernel trees on the same distro. Example:-
2.6.19.1 for - software/tools development
2.4.34for - embedded systems development.
I do know that 2.6 supports embedded in a big waybut still
requirement demands to work with such boards
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Hello All,
>
> I am looking to use multiple kernel trees on the same distro. Example:-
>
> 2.6.19.1 for - software/tools development
> 2.4.34for - embedded systems development.
>
> I do know that 2.6 supports embedded in a big waybut
Hello All,
I am looking to use multiple kernel trees on the same distro. Example:-
2.6.19.1 for - software/tools development
2.4.34for - embedded systems development.
I do know that 2.6 supports embedded in a big waybut still
requirement demands to work with such boards as an example:-
Hello All,
I am looking to use multiple kernel trees on the same distro. Example:-
2.6.19.1 for - software/tools development
2.4.34for - embedded systems development.
I do know that 2.6 supports embedded in a big waybut still
requirement demands to work with such boards as an example:-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Hello All,
I am looking to use multiple kernel trees on the same distro. Example:-
2.6.19.1 for - software/tools development
2.4.34for - embedded systems development.
I do know that 2.6 supports embedded in a big waybut still
Akula2 wrote:
Hello All,
I am looking to use multiple kernel trees on the same distro. Example:-
2.6.19.1 for - software/tools development
2.4.34for - embedded systems development.
I do know that 2.6 supports embedded in a big waybut still
requirement demands to work with such boards
There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while newer
linux-2.6 support/prefer gcc-3.? or greater.
At any rate, what
Steve Brueggeman wrote:
There are some difficulties with gcc versions between linux-2.4 and linux-2.6,
but I do not recall all of the details off of the top of my head. If I recall
correctly, one of the issues is, linux-2.4 ?prefers? gcc-2.96, while newer
linux-2.6 support/prefer gcc-3.? or
32 matches
Mail list logo
