...
>
> If the problem occured with CONFIG_XFS_FS=m I understand what went
> wrong.
>
Yes, it was
> It seems to be correct.
>
> This was a side effect of Roman's fix for the XFS <-> EXPORTFS
> dependency.
>
Thanks a lot,
Joel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:01:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>
> Got this report about 2.6.11-rc3. Is this the correct solution?
>
> - Forwarded message from Joel Soete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> A short analyse, it seems that's because NFSD was builtin while EXPORTFS
> was a module
Got this report about 2.6.11-rc3. Is this the correct solution?
- Forwarded message from Joel Soete <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
A short analyse, it seems that's because NFSD was builtin while EXPORTFS
was a module in my previous config file. Imho EXPORTFS would be build as
NFSD?
Is the
Got this report about 2.6.11-rc3. Is this the correct solution?
- Forwarded message from Joel Soete [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
A short analyse, it seems that's because NFSD was builtin while EXPORTFS
was a module in my previous config file. Imho EXPORTFS would be build as
NFSD?
Is the
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:01:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Got this report about 2.6.11-rc3. Is this the correct solution?
- Forwarded message from Joel Soete [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
A short analyse, it seems that's because NFSD was builtin while EXPORTFS
was a module in my
...
If the problem occured with CONFIG_XFS_FS=m I understand what went
wrong.
Yes, it was
It seems to be correct.
This was a side effect of Roman's fix for the XFS - EXPORTFS
dependency.
Thanks a lot,
Joel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
6 matches
Mail list logo