Re: New via82cxxx.c - still not working here

2000-09-19 Thread Andre Hedrick
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Dan Aloni wrote: > /sbin/hdparm -c 1 -m 16 -d -X66 /dev/hda > /sbin/hdparm -S 50 /dev/hda > /sbin/hdparm -c 1 -m 16 -d -X66 /dev/hdc We do not do this kind of mucking around if you use chipset code. Not all chipsets support reprograming of the interface with the hdparm calls

Re: New via82cxxx.c - still not working here

2000-09-19 Thread Dan Aloni
On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: Hi Vojtech. > And, could you send the 'hdparm -i' information along, too? Plus the IDE > kernel messages before the seekerror/timeouts would help, too. VP_IDE: VIA vt82c596b IDE UMDA66 controller on pci0:7.1 Actually I get other stuff than SeekError:

Re: New via82cxxx.c - still not working here

2000-09-18 Thread Vojtech Pavlik
Hi! And, could you send the 'hdparm -i' information along, too? Plus the IDE kernel messages before the seekerror/timeouts would help, too. Youu have a vt82c596a chipset, one rare enough so I wasn't able to test with yet. Btw, are you sure it supports ata66? My docs say it should not, so the ide

Re: New via82cxxx.c - still not working here

2000-09-18 Thread Andre Hedrick
Ask Vojtech ... He is doing this chipset for linux now. Cheers, On Tue, 19 Sep 2000, Dan Aloni wrote: > > I've tried to boot 2.4.0-test9-pre2 yesterday and it halted at the point > where it tried to read the paratition table, outputing all sorts of > errors (SeekError, IIRC). So I replaced v

New via82cxxx.c - still not working here

2000-09-18 Thread Dan Aloni
I've tried to boot 2.4.0-test9-pre2 yesterday and it halted at the point where it tried to read the paratition table, outputing all sorts of errors (SeekError, IIRC). So I replaced via82cxxx.c with the older version from test6 and now it's working. Here is what I see with the old via82cxxx.c: d