Hi Alan,
As I can see, the patch never made it in 2.4.x, right?!
So, I would like a diff - if still possible :-)
I submitted it ages ago but it was rejected and punted to 2.6. The 2.4
support is available in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, so you can pull it
out of the source rpms on the ftp site or
Hi Alan,
As I can see, the patch never made it in 2.4.x, right?!
So, I would like a diff - if still possible :-)
I submitted it ages ago but it was rejected and punted to 2.6. The 2.4
support is available in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, so you can pull it
out of the source rpms on the ftp site or
On Maw, 2005-04-05 at 09:49, Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
> As I can see, the patch never made it in 2.4.x, right?!
> So, I would like a diff - if still possible :-)
I submitted it ages ago but it was rejected and punted to 2.6. The 2.4
support is available in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, so you
On Maw, 2005-04-05 at 09:49, Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
As I can see, the patch never made it in 2.4.x, right?!
So, I would like a diff - if still possible :-)
I submitted it ages ago but it was rejected and punted to 2.6. The 2.4
support is available in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, so you can
Hello there,
After 2½ year I stumbled over this thread:
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 13:23, Alan Cox wrote:
2.5 propses including the ability to set the %age between the 0% of
mode 3, the 50 of mode 2 and upwards to things relevant in some
embedded system cases. So for 2.6 you will be able to tune it in
Hello there,
After 2½ year I stumbled over this thread:
On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 13:23, Alan Cox wrote:
2.5 propses including the ability to set the %age between the 0% of
mode 3, the 50 of mode 2 and upwards to things relevant in some
embedded system cases. So for 2.6 you will be able to tune it in
6 matches
Mail list logo
