On Wednesday, 9 of March 2005 20:31, Jason Lunz wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> > You know what would be really useful... if www.kernel.org listed the
> > "latest -ac" patch as something current instead of 2.6.10-ac12, which was
> > a great patch in its day, but hasn't been current for a while.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> You know what would be really useful... if www.kernel.org listed the
> "latest -ac" patch as something current instead of 2.6.10-ac12, which was
> a great patch in its day, but hasn't been current for a while.
>
> In fairness, the -mm is out of date, too. Perhaps a bit of
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> 2.6.11-ac2
> o Merge 2.6.11.2 (Greg Kroah-Hartmann)
> including epoll error handling (Georgi Guninski)
> | Theoretically security
> o Fix a couple of pwc warnings
2.6.11-ac2
o Merge 2.6.11.2 (Greg Kroah-Hartmann)
including epoll error handling (Georgi Guninski)
| Theoretically security
o Fix a couple of pwc warnings(Alan Cox)
o Ressurect epca driver
2.6.11-ac2
o Merge 2.6.11.2 (Greg Kroah-Hartmann)
including epoll error handling (Georgi Guninski)
| Theoretically security
o Fix a couple of pwc warnings(Alan Cox)
o Ressurect epca driver
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Alan Cox wrote:
2.6.11-ac2
o Merge 2.6.11.2 (Greg Kroah-Hartmann)
including epoll error handling (Georgi Guninski)
| Theoretically security
o Fix a couple of pwc warnings(Alan Cox)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You know what would be really useful... if www.kernel.org listed the
latest -ac patch as something current instead of 2.6.10-ac12, which was
a great patch in its day, but hasn't been current for a while.
In fairness, the -mm is out of date, too. Perhaps a bit of
On Wednesday, 9 of March 2005 20:31, Jason Lunz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You know what would be really useful... if www.kernel.org listed the
latest -ac patch as something current instead of 2.6.10-ac12, which was
a great patch in its day, but hasn't been current for a while.
In
8 matches
Mail list logo
