On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, October 26, 2012 01:07:51 PM Huang Ying wrote:
>> There are comments on why PME poll support is necessary for PCI
>> devices, but not for PCIe devices. That may lead to misunderstanding
>> that PME poll is only necessary for
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Friday, October 26, 2012 01:07:51 PM Huang Ying wrote:
There are comments on why PME poll support is necessary for PCI
devices, but not for PCIe devices. That may lead to misunderstanding
that PME poll is only necessary
On Friday, October 26, 2012 01:07:51 PM Huang Ying wrote:
> There are comments on why PME poll support is necessary for PCI
> devices, but not for PCIe devices. That may lead to misunderstanding
> that PME poll is only necessary for PCI devices. So add comments
> related to PCIe PME poll to make
On Friday, October 26, 2012 01:07:51 PM Huang Ying wrote:
There are comments on why PME poll support is necessary for PCI
devices, but not for PCIe devices. That may lead to misunderstanding
that PME poll is only necessary for PCI devices. So add comments
related to PCIe PME poll to make it
There are comments on why PME poll support is necessary for PCI
devices, but not for PCIe devices. That may lead to misunderstanding
that PME poll is only necessary for PCI devices. So add comments
related to PCIe PME poll to make it more clear.
The content of comments comes from the changelog
There are comments on why PME poll support is necessary for PCI
devices, but not for PCIe devices. That may lead to misunderstanding
that PME poll is only necessary for PCI devices. So add comments
related to PCIe PME poll to make it more clear.
The content of comments comes from the changelog
6 matches
Mail list logo
