Re: PPP bug in 2.4.1-ac20 ?

2001-03-02 Thread Andreas Tobler
Andreas Tobler wrote: > > Daniel Stutz wrote: > > > > pppd version is 2.3.11 > > > > In all 2.4.1 versions pppd exits with something like: > > ioctl(PPPIOFLAGS): invalid argument > > > > I don't know if this is fixed in a 2.4.2 version. > > I don't even know if this is not a pppd bug.

Re: PPP bug in 2.4.1-ac20 ?

2001-03-02 Thread Andreas Tobler
Daniel Stutz wrote: > > pppd version is 2.3.11 > > In all 2.4.1 versions pppd exits with something like: > ioctl(PPPIOFLAGS): invalid argument > > I don't know if this is fixed in a 2.4.2 version. > I don't even know if this is not a pppd bug. Update pppd to version 2.4.x e.g from

PPP bug in 2.4.1-ac20 ?

2001-03-02 Thread Daniel Stutz
pppd version is 2.3.11 In all 2.4.1 versions pppd exits with something like: ioctl(PPPIOFLAGS): invalid argument I don't know if this is fixed in a 2.4.2 version. I don't even know if this is not a pppd bug. Daniel -- -- In God we Trust, all others please submit signed PGP/X.509 key

PPP bug in 2.4.1-ac20 ?

2001-03-02 Thread Daniel Stutz
pppd version is 2.3.11 In all 2.4.1 versions pppd exits with something like: ioctl(PPPIOFLAGS): invalid argument I don't know if this is fixed in a 2.4.2 version. I don't even know if this is not a pppd bug. Daniel -- -- In God we Trust, all others please submit signed PGP/X.509 key

Re: PPP bug in 2.4.1-ac20 ?

2001-03-02 Thread Andreas Tobler
Andreas Tobler wrote: Daniel Stutz wrote: pppd version is 2.3.11 In all 2.4.1 versions pppd exits with something like: ioctl(PPPIOFLAGS): invalid argument I don't know if this is fixed in a 2.4.2 version. I don't even know if this is not a pppd bug. Update pppd to