Re: Partial revert of "powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls"

2015-12-17 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 2015-16-12 at 10:53:29 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote: > This partially reverts commit a34236155afb1cc41945e58388ac988431bcb0b8. > > While reviewing the glibc patch to exploit the individual IPC calls, > Arnd & Andreas noticed that we were still requiring userspace to pass > IPC_64 in order

Re: Partial revert of "powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls"

2015-12-17 Thread Michael Ellerman
On Wed, 2015-16-12 at 10:53:29 UTC, Michael Ellerman wrote: > This partially reverts commit a34236155afb1cc41945e58388ac988431bcb0b8. > > While reviewing the glibc patch to exploit the individual IPC calls, > Arnd & Andreas noticed that we were still requiring userspace to pass > IPC_64 in order

[PATCH] Partial revert of "powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls"

2015-12-16 Thread Michael Ellerman
This partially reverts commit a34236155afb1cc41945e58388ac988431bcb0b8. While reviewing the glibc patch to exploit the individual IPC calls, Arnd & Andreas noticed that we were still requiring userspace to pass IPC_64 in order to get the new style IPC API. With a bit of cleanup in the kernel we

[PATCH] Partial revert of "powerpc: Individual System V IPC system calls"

2015-12-16 Thread Michael Ellerman
This partially reverts commit a34236155afb1cc41945e58388ac988431bcb0b8. While reviewing the glibc patch to exploit the individual IPC calls, Arnd & Andreas noticed that we were still requiring userspace to pass IPC_64 in order to get the new style IPC API. With a bit of cleanup in the kernel we