Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Thomas Sailer
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:37 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: > FWIW, the patch in question is a one-liner: That's not a valid argument. This may work with a WM5 device, but looks very dubious, wrt. other RNDIS devices. Why are these constants hardcoded and not taken in some way from the descriptors?

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Grosjo.net - jom
FWIW, the patch in question is a one-liner: Yes, that is why it shall be probably possible to include it in the kernel ? I do not have the contact with SynCE developers. Maybe one of you have. Jom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:32 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > On Die, 2007-10-09 at 12:20 +0300, Grosjo.net - jom wrote: > [...] > > Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) > > for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is > > very

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Pekka Enberg
Hi, On 10/9/07, Grosjo.net - jom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) > for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is > very convenient to connect it to the laptop under Linux Sounds useful so please ask

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Die, 2007-10-09 at 12:20 +0300, Grosjo.net - jom wrote: [...] > Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) > for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is > very convenient to connect it to the laptop under Linux do { Test them

Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Grosjo.net - jom
Dear all, Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is very convenient to connect it to the laptop under Linux

Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Grosjo.net - jom
Dear all, Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is very convenient to connect it to the laptop under Linux

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Bernd Petrovitsch
On Die, 2007-10-09 at 12:20 +0300, Grosjo.net - jom wrote: [...] Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is very convenient to connect it to the laptop under Linux do { Test them review

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Pekka Enberg
Hi, On 10/9/07, Grosjo.net - jom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is very convenient to connect it to the laptop under Linux Sounds useful so please ask the

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:32 +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: On Die, 2007-10-09 at 12:20 +0300, Grosjo.net - jom wrote: [...] Would it be possible to include the patches (available on www.synce.org) for WindowsMobile5, as most mobile phones are under Window$, and it is very convenient to

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Grosjo.net - jom
FWIW, the patch in question is a one-liner: Yes, that is why it shall be probably possible to include it in the kernel ? I do not have the contact with SynCE developers. Maybe one of you have. Jom - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: Patch for WindowsMobile5 on Linux Kernel

2007-10-09 Thread Thomas Sailer
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:37 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: FWIW, the patch in question is a one-liner: That's not a valid argument. This may work with a WM5 device, but looks very dubious, wrt. other RNDIS devices. Why are these constants hardcoded and not taken in some way from the descriptors?