> On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:30 -0400
> > Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > If the chip locks up, we get into a long polling loop,
> > > where the softlockup detector kicks in.
> > > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bug
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:55:05PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:30 -0400
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If the chip locks up, we get into a long polling loop,
> > where the softlockup detector kicks in.
> > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachm
> If the chip locks up, we get into a long polling loop,
> where the softlockup detector kicks in.
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151878
> for an example.
Okay. Thanks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Antonino Daplas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 11:36:30 -0400
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If the chip locks up, we get into a long polling loop,
> where the softlockup detector kicks in.
> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151878
> for an example.
Surely in this situation the softlockup
If the chip locks up, we get into a long polling loop,
where the softlockup detector kicks in.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=151878
for an example.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- linux-2.6.20.noarch/drivers/video/nvidia/nv_accel.c~2007-04-23
5 matches
Mail list logo