On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:22:54PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:52:24 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> > The patchset used to contain lots of debugging support which wildly
> > duplicated thigs which we already did and was generally overdone. That
> > appears to all have been
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:52:24 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
> Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
> > &g
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >
> > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
> > git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
> >
> > The UBI tree has been i
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Lin
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> > >
> > > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
> > > git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> >
> > Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
> > git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
> >
> > The UBI tree has been in -mm for several rele
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
>
> Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
> git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
>
> The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to
> see it in the mainline.
Quite frankly, I have absolutely _zero_ visi
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to
see it in the mainline.
We have several groups using UBI now and it has proved to be fairly
stable. We've also got some feedback from community
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to
see it in the mainline.
We have several groups using UBI now and it has proved to be fairly
stable. We've also got some feedback from community
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to
see it in the mainline.
Quite frankly, I have absolutely _zero_ visibility into things like
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to
see it in the mainline
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
The UBI tree has been in -mm
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 20:30 +0300, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:00 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
The UBI tree has been in -mm for several releases and we would like to
see
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:52:24 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Linus, please, pull UBI tree from
git://git.infradead.org/ubi-2.6.git for-linus
The UBI tree
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 02:22:54PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Fri, 27 Apr 2007 13:52:24 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote:
The patchset used to contain lots of debugging support which wildly
duplicated thigs which we already did and was generally overdone. That
appears to all have been cleaned
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:08 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Please send out a current version for review instead. Last time I looked
> at it lots of things looked quite over-engineered, and I'd like to check
> if this has been improved since.
The patch is big and LKML does filtered the mail.
On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 16:08 +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Please send out a current version for review instead. Last time I looked
at it lots of things looked quite over-engineered, and I'd like to check
if this has been improved since.
The patch is big and LKML does filtered the mail.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Hello Linus,
>
> The UBI tree has been in -mm for a few releases now and we would like to
> to see it in the mainline.
Please send out a current version for review instead. Last time I looked
at it lots of things looked quite
Hello Linus,
The UBI tree has been in -mm for a few releases now and we would like to
to see it in the mainline.
We have several groups using the code now and it has proved to be fairly
stable thus far. We've also got some feedback from people outside the
community.
In short, UBI is kind of LVM
Hello Linus,
The UBI tree has been in -mm for a few releases now and we would like to
to see it in the mainline.
We have several groups using the code now and it has proved to be fairly
stable thus far. We've also got some feedback from people outside the
community.
In short, UBI is kind of LVM
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 05:34:12PM +0200, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
Hello Linus,
The UBI tree has been in -mm for a few releases now and we would like to
to see it in the mainline.
Please send out a current version for review instead. Last time I looked
at it lots of things looked quite
22 matches
Mail list logo
