In article <01a301c0895e$b142cc90$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
mirabilos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
>Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
Only if Jens sends it to me in a timely fashion (which by now means
"real soon").
On Sun, Jan 28 2001, mirabilos wrote:
> Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
No, I haven't submitted it yet due to the massive restructering. Plus,
it also touches other parts than loop itself.
> Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
> So for others if there are.
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
So for others if there are.
mirabilos
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12+custom(^=href;C-style-comments)
GO/S dx@ s--: a---> C++ UL P--- L++$(-^lang) E/joe W+(++)
N?
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
So for others if there are.
mirabilos
-BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-
Version: 3.12+custom(^=href;C-style-comments)
GO/S dx@ s--: a--- C++ UL P--- L++$(-^lang) E/joe W+(++)
N?
On Sun, Jan 28 2001, mirabilos wrote:
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
No, I haven't submitted it yet due to the massive restructering. Plus,
it also touches other parts than loop itself.
Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
So for others if there are.
In article 01a301c0895e$b142cc90$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
mirabilos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch?
Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy.
Only if Jens sends it to me in a timely fashion (which by now means
"real soon").
6 matches
Mail list logo