Re: Q: Release of 2.4.1

2001-01-28 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article <01a301c0895e$b142cc90$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, mirabilos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch? >Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy. Only if Jens sends it to me in a timely fashion (which by now means "real soon").

Re: Q: Release of 2.4.1

2001-01-28 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Jan 28 2001, mirabilos wrote: > Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch? No, I haven't submitted it yet due to the massive restructering. Plus, it also touches other parts than loop itself. > Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy. > So for others if there are.

Q: Release of 2.4.1

2001-01-28 Thread mirabilos
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch? Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy. So for others if there are. mirabilos -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12+custom(^=href;C-style-comments) GO/S dx@ s--: a---> C++ UL P--- L++$(-^lang) E/joe W+(++) N?

Q: Release of 2.4.1

2001-01-28 Thread mirabilos
Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch? Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy. So for others if there are. mirabilos -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12+custom(^=href;C-style-comments) GO/S dx@ s--: a--- C++ UL P--- L++$(-^lang) E/joe W+(++) N?

Re: Q: Release of 2.4.1

2001-01-28 Thread Jens Axboe
On Sun, Jan 28 2001, mirabilos wrote: Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch? No, I haven't submitted it yet due to the massive restructering. Plus, it also touches other parts than loop itself. Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy. So for others if there are.

Re: Q: Release of 2.4.1

2001-01-28 Thread Linus Torvalds
In article 01a301c0895e$b142cc90$[EMAIL PROTECTED], mirabilos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does 2.4.1 when released, include e.g. Jens' loop patch? Because it seems stable and loop else were buggy. Only if Jens sends it to me in a timely fashion (which by now means "real soon").