* Mitchell Erblich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Galbraith wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> > > Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
> > >
> > > Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
> > > missing is the RT for .task_new.
> >
> > No
* Mitchell Erblich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
missing is the RT for .task_new.
No class specific
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 11:10 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> However,
> in reality, alot of RT class specific init is done. Just currently
> none of it is done in this non-existant function.
Patch?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 11:10 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
However,
in reality, alot of RT class specific init is done. Just currently
none of it is done in this non-existant function.
Patch?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
> > Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
> >
> > Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
> > missing is the RT for .task_new.
>
> No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks.
>
>
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote:
Group, Ingo Molnar, etc,
Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair?
missing is the RT for .task_new.
No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks.
-Mike
6 matches
Mail list logo