Re: QUESTION: RT & SCHED & fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fairfor RT tasks.

2007-08-24 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mitchell Erblich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mike Galbraith wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote: > > > Group, Ingo Molnar, etc, > > > > > > Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair? > > > missing is the RT for .task_new. > > > > No

Re: QUESTION: RT SCHED fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fairfor RT tasks.

2007-08-24 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Mitchell Erblich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mike Galbraith wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote: Group, Ingo Molnar, etc, Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair? missing is the RT for .task_new. No class specific

Re: QUESTION: RT & SCHED & fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fairfor RT tasks.

2007-08-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 11:10 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote: > However, > in reality, alot of RT class specific init is done. Just currently > none of it is done in this non-existant function. Patch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body

Re: QUESTION: RT SCHED fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fairfor RT tasks.

2007-08-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Wed, 2007-08-15 at 11:10 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote: However, in reality, alot of RT class specific init is done. Just currently none of it is done in this non-existant function. Patch? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: QUESTION: RT & SCHED & fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fairfor RT tasks.

2007-08-15 Thread Mitchell Erblich
Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote: > > Group, Ingo Molnar, etc, > > > > Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair? > > missing is the RT for .task_new. > > No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks. > >

Re: QUESTION: RT SCHED fork: ?MISSING EQUIV of task_new_fairfor RT tasks.

2007-08-15 Thread Mitchell Erblich
Mike Galbraith wrote: On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 12:28 -0700, Mitchell Erblich wrote: Group, Ingo Molnar, etc, Why does the rt sched_class contain fewer elements than fair? missing is the RT for .task_new. No class specific initialization needs to be done for RT tasks. -Mike