Re: Question about git branches, features, reverts, etc on subsystem maintainers tree?

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > To give you a 3.9 branch I am thinking to either: > > a). revert the merges I've for this new feature altogether and > merge it later in v3.10 time-frame. They make about 50% off the > code in this branch, so its big

Question about git branches, features, reverts, etc on subsystem maintainers tree?

Hey Linus, I am hoping you can help out. I've a branch for 3.9 which has some code that depends on the changes to the Xen hypervisor. The changes to the Xen hypervisor are still in flux - aka they are not baked. The code on the Linux side that uses this is marked with EXPERIMENTAL to ward off

Question about git branches, features, reverts, etc on subsystem maintainers tree?

Hey Linus, I am hoping you can help out. I've a branch for 3.9 which has some code that depends on the changes to the Xen hypervisor. The changes to the Xen hypervisor are still in flux - aka they are not baked. The code on the Linux side that uses this is marked with EXPERIMENTAL to ward off

Re: Question about git branches, features, reverts, etc on subsystem maintainers tree?

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote: To give you a 3.9 branch I am thinking to either: a). revert the merges I've for this new feature altogether and merge it later in v3.10 time-frame. They make about 50% off the code in this