Re: Question on Scheduler activations

2005-03-18 Thread Diego Calleja
El Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:46:42 +0530,
Imanpreet Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:

> I don't mind RTFM but do you care to provide the M.  That is if you have any.

What "Update: this document is obsolete" means is that the document is 
obsolete. 

Probably it should include a link to 
http://people.redhat.com/drepper/nptl-design.pdf
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: Question on Scheduler activations

2005-03-18 Thread Imanpreet Arora
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0530, Hong Kong Phoey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RTFM




On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:36:58 +0530, Hong Kong Phoey
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RTFM

I don't mind RTFM but do you care to provide the M.  That is if you have any.

-- 

Imanpreet Singh Arora
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Re: Question on Scheduler activations

2005-03-18 Thread Hong Kong Phoey
RTFM


On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:38:45 +0530, Imanpreet Arora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> 
>I came across
> 
>http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html
> 
>It seems to arouse a bit of confusion. _FIRST_ it says that scheduler
> activations are BAD. Then it delves on the possible implementation of
> Scheduler activations in Linux. Though I know that scheduler
> activations are not part of the present kernel. Could anyone provide
> BOTH the short and long answer to
> 
> a)  If they were ever implemented?
> b)  Reasons for rejection?
> 
> TIA
> 
> --
> 
> Imanpreet Singh Arora
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


Question on Scheduler activations

2005-03-18 Thread Imanpreet Arora
Hello,

I came across 

http://people.redhat.com/drepper/glibcthreads.html

It seems to arouse a bit of confusion. _FIRST_ it says that scheduler
activations are BAD. Then it delves on the possible implementation of
Scheduler activations in Linux. Though I know that scheduler
activations are not part of the present kernel. Could anyone provide
BOTH the short and long answer to

a)  If they were ever implemented?
b)  Reasons for rejection?


TIA

-- 

Imanpreet Singh Arora
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/