[Marc Mutz]
> > +TOPDIR := $(shell pwd -P)
> That is specific to the bash builtin 'pwd'. GNU sh-util's pwd does
> not know that option (at least not my version, which is: "pwd (GNU
> sh-utils) 1.16")
It passed my 5-second shell feature portability test (ash). Checking
again, I see that the
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> +TOPDIR := $(shell pwd -P)
That is specific to the bash builtin 'pwd'. GNU sh-util's pwd does not
know that option (at least not my version, which is: "pwd (GNU sh-utils)
1.16")
I just wanted to note that...
Marc
--
Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]
> Should that not be first converted to paths that contain no symlinks?
I agree.
--- Makefile~ Tue Nov 28 21:53:31 2000
+++ MakefileFri Dec 1 12:25:28 2000
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
CONFIG_SHELL := $(shell if [ -x "$$BASH" ]; then echo $$BASH; \
else
Peter Samuelson wrote:
>
> Many people limit their e-mail messages to 80 columns. What for?
>
CF'mon, linebreaks are bloat! Those extra characters all around :-)
> The 'build' symlink is to make it easier for external module
> installation scripts to find the build directory for a given
Peter Samuelson wrote:
snip
Many people limit their e-mail messages to 80 columns. What for?
CF'mon, linebreaks are bloat! Those extra characters all around :-)
The 'build' symlink is to make it easier for external module
installation scripts to find the build directory for a given
[Marc Mutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Should that not be first converted to paths that contain no symlinks?
I agree.
--- Makefile~ Tue Nov 28 21:53:31 2000
+++ MakefileFri Dec 1 12:25:28 2000
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
CONFIG_SHELL := $(shell if [ -x "$$BASH" ]; then echo $$BASH; \
else if [
Peter Samuelson wrote:
snip
+TOPDIR := $(shell pwd -P)
snip
That is specific to the bash builtin 'pwd'. GNU sh-util's pwd does not
know that option (at least not my version, which is: "pwd (GNU sh-utils)
1.16")
I just wanted to note that...
Marc
--
Marc Mutz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Marc Mutz]
+TOPDIR := $(shell pwd -P)
That is specific to the bash builtin 'pwd'. GNU sh-util's pwd does
not know that option (at least not my version, which is: "pwd (GNU
sh-utils) 1.16")
It passed my 5-second shell feature portability test (ash). Checking
again, I see that the ash
[Android]
> 1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11: build->/usr/src/linuxcreated by the
>Makefile (make modules_install). What for?
Many people limit their e-mail messages to 80 columns. What for?
The 'build' symlink is to make it easier for external module
installation scripts to find
[Android]
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11: build-/usr/src/linuxcreated by the
Makefile (make modules_install). What for?
Many people limit their e-mail messages to 80 columns. What for?
The 'build' symlink is to make it easier for external module
installation scripts to find the
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
There was
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linuxcreated by the Makefile
(make modules_install). What for?
2) (Answered)
3) (Answered)
4) Some of the device special files are missing
when using devfs.
devfsd is running (loaded at the beginning of rc.S
by init).
There was
- Original Message -
From:
Android
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:20
PM
Subject: Questions about Kernel
2.4.0.?
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make modules_inst
- Original Message -
From:
Android
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2000 2:20
PM
Subject: Questions about Kernel
2.4.0.?
1) There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make modules_install
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:20:39 -0800,
"Android" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11: build->/usr/src/linux
>created by the Makefile (make modules_install).
>What for? depmod doesn't like this link. It gets confused.
grep modutils Documentation/Changes
-
To
There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build->/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make
modules_install).What for? depmod doesn't like this link. It gets
confused.
Lines missing from
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/uaccess.h: #define
put_user_ret(x,ptr,ret) ({ if (put_user(x,ptr))
There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11:
build-/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make
modules_install).What for? depmod doesn't like this link. It gets
confused.
Lines missing from
/usr/src/linux/include/asm/uaccess.h: #define
put_user_ret(x,ptr,ret) ({ if (put_user(x,ptr)) return
On Sat, 25 Nov 2000 14:20:39 -0800,
"Android" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a link in /lib/modules/2.4.0.11: build-/usr/src/linux
created by the Makefile (make modules_install).
What for? depmod doesn't like this link. It gets confused.
grep modutils Documentation/Changes
-
To unsubscribe
20 matches
Mail list logo
