On 4/23/2024 4:06 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:48:08AM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 4/8/2024 3:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:41:20PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
From: Hou Tao
Hi,
The patch set aims to
On 3/29/24 13:26, Luca Weiss wrote:
Configure the Type-C and VBUS regulator on PM7250B and wire it up to the
USB PHY, so that USB role and orientation switching works.
For now USB Power Delivery properties are skipped / disabled, so that
the (presumably) bootloader-configured charger doesn't
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 17:16:34 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:17 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:22:27 -0500, Huang, Kai
wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 20:14 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > > I think we can add support for "sgx_cgroup=disabled" in
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:57 PM Simon Horman wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:17:31AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:14 AM Jason Xing
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Simon,
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:28 AM Simon Horman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 22,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:17:31AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:14 AM Jason Xing wrote:
> >
> > Hi Simon,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:28 AM Simon Horman wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:01:03AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > >
On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 17:25 +0800, 朱伯君(杰铭) wrote:
> EDMM's ioctl()s support batch operations, which may be
> time-consuming. Try to explicitly give up the CPU at
> the every end of "for loop" in
> sgx_enclave_{ modify_types | restrict_permissions | remove_pages}
> to give other tasks a chance to
Hello Matthieu,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 6:02 PM Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 23/04/2024 09:21, Jason Xing wrote:
> > From: Jason Xing
> >
> > It relys on what reset options in the skb are as rfc8684 says. Reusing
>
> (if you have something else to fix, 'checkpatch.pl --codespell'
On 23.04.24 05:41, zhenwei pi wrote:
All the VM events related statistics have dependence on
'CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS', separate these events into a function to
make code clean. Then we can remove 'CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS' from
'update_balloon_stats'.
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi
---
Hi Jason,
On 23/04/2024 09:21, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> Since we have mapped every mptcp reset reason definition in enum
> sk_rst_reason, introducing a new helper can cover some missing places
> where we have already set the subflow->reset_reason.
>
> Note: using
Hi Jason,
On 23/04/2024 09:21, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> It relys on what reset options in the skb are as rfc8684 says. Reusing
(if you have something else to fix, 'checkpatch.pl --codespell' reported
a warning here: s/relys/relies/)
> this logic can save us much energy. This
Hi Jason,
On 23/04/2024 09:21, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> Like what we did to passive reset:
> only passing possible reset reason in each active reset path.
>
> No functional changes.
(...)
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 4 +++-
> net/mptcp/subflow.c | 5 +++--
For the
Hi Jason,
On 23/04/2024 09:21, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> Adjust the parameter and support passing reason of reset which
> is for now NOT_SPECIFIED. No functional changes.
(...)
> net/mptcp/subflow.c| 8 +---
For the modifications in MPTCP:
Acked-by: Matthieu
Hi Jason,
On 23/04/2024 09:21, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support
> both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP protocols.
>
> This patch only does the preparations for reset reason mechanism,
> nothing else
On 4/23/24 17:13, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:41:07AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
[snip]
#define VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NAMES_WITH_PREFIX(VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NAMES_prefix) { \
VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NAMES_prefix "swap-in", \
Looks like a useful extension. But
any UAPI
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:41:07AM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> When the guest OS runs under critical memory pressure, the guest
> starts to kill processes. A guest monitor agent may scan 'oom_kill'
> from /proc/vmstat, and reports the OOM KILL event. However, the agent
> may be killed and we will
Hi mst.
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin
> Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2024 4:35 PM
> To: Gavin Liu
> Cc: jasow...@redhat.com; Angus Chen ;
> virtualizat...@lists.linux.dev; xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Heng Qi
> Su
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 11:09:59AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:05 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 08:57:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 5:29 PM Michael S. Tsirkin
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024
angus.c...@jaguarmicro.com;
> virtualizat...@lists.linux.dev; xuanz...@linux.alibaba.com;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Heng Qi hen...@linux.alibaba.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] vp_vdpa: don't allocate unused msix vectors
>
>
>
> External Mail: This email originated fr
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 20:20 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson
>
> Add initial documentation of how to regulate the distribution of
> SGX Enclave Page Cache (EPC) memory via the Miscellaneous cgroup
> controller.
>
>
Acked-by: Kai Huang
On 23.04.24 00:15, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
>> sta...@kernel.org is there to route to /dev/null on purpose so that
>> developers/maintainers who only want their patches to get picked up when
>> they hit Linus's tree, will have happen and not notify anyone else.
>> This is especially good
On Mon, 2024-04-15 at 20:20 -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> Enclave Page Cache(EPC) memory can be swapped out to regular system
> memory, and the consumed memory should be charged to a proper
> mem_cgroup. Currently the selection of mem_cgroup to charge is done in
> sgx_encl_get_mem_cgroup(). But it
On 4/23/24 06:46, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:15:24PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 3/30/24 19:02, Gavin Shan wrote:
On 3/28/24 19:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:21:49AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
All the callers of vhost_get_avail_idx() are
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 4:05 AM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 08:57:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 5:29 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:28:23PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > > > Add the function
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 10:14 AM Jason Xing wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:28 AM Simon Horman wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:01:03AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 2:28 AM Simon Horman wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:01:03AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h
>
> ...
>
> > +/**
> > + * There are three parts in order:
> > + * 1) reset reason in MPTCP:
Hello,
syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any
issue:
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+6c21aeb59d0e82eb2...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested on:
commit: bcc17a06 vhost/vsock: always initialize seqpacket_allow
git tree:
n irq_do_set_affinity return
> -ENOSPC
>
> When a CPU goes offline, the interrupts pinned to that CPU are
> re-configured.
>
> Its managed interrupts undergo either migration to other CPUs or shutdown
> if all CPUs listed in the affinity are offline. This patch doesn't affect
> m
Quoting Duje Mihanović (2024-04-20 06:32:56)
> On 4/20/24 00:24, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Duje Mihanović (2024-04-19 07:31:14)
> >> On Friday, April 12, 2024 4:57:09 AM GMT+2 Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> Quoting Duje Mihanović (2024-04-11 03:15:34)
> >>>
> On 4/11/2024 10:00 AM, Stephen
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:55:25 -0700
Beau Belgrave wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 09:50:52PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:13:34 -0700
> > Beau Belgrave wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:33:05AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024
.
Would you mind suggesting if the below commit message is fine to you?
genirq/cpuhotplug: retry with cpu_online_mask when irq_do_set_affinity return
-ENOSPC
When a CPU goes offline, the interrupts pinned to that CPU are
re-configured.
Its managed interrupts undergo either migration to other CPU
On 4/18/24 12:03, Luca Weiss wrote:
On Thu Apr 18, 2024 at 12:01 PM CEST, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
On 18.04.2024 8:36 AM, Luca Weiss wrote:
Add a node for the vibrator module found inside the PMI632.
Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss
---
Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio
On a side note, this is a
On Mon, 2024-04-22 at 11:17 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:22:27 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 20:14 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > > > I think we can add support for "sgx_cgroup=disabled" in future if
> > > indeed
> > > > > needed. But just for
Em Tue, 23 Apr 2024 00:04:01 +0200
Greg KH escreveu:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:46:37PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > Em Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:25:18 -0400
> > Konstantin Ryabitsev escreveu:
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:49:29PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > >
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 10:46:37PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:25:18 -0400
> Konstantin Ryabitsev escreveu:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:49:29PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > @Greg, BTW: should this be stable+noauto...@kernel.org or have a
> > >
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 09:50:52PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:13:34 -0700
> Beau Belgrave wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 11:33:05AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:41:01 +
> > > Beau Belgrave wrote:
*SNIP*
> > > nit: This loop
Em Mon, 22 Apr 2024 15:25:18 -0400
Konstantin Ryabitsev escreveu:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:49:29PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > @Greg, BTW: should this be stable+noauto...@kernel.org or have a
> > 'vger.'
>
> No vger, just stable+whate...@kernel.org.
>
> > in it, e.g.
On 4/22/24 22:06, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:48:08AM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 4/8/2024 3:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:41:20PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
From: Hou Tao
Hi,
The patch set aims to fix
2-49,51-86
>
> This issue should not happen for managed IRQs because the vectors are already
> reserved before CPU hotplug.
Should not? It either does or it does not.
> For regular IRQs, do a re-try with all online
> CPUs if the prior irq_do_set_affinity() is failed with -ENOSPC.
>
> Cc
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 02:25:59PM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> RFC -> v1:
> - several text changes: oom-kill -> oom-kills, SCAN_ASYNC -> ASYN_SCAN.
> - move vm events codes into '#ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS'
>
> RFC version:
> Link:
>
On 22 Apr 20:59, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > The benefit - to me - is very clear. People do use hugetlb mappings to
> > run code in production environments. The perf benefits are there for some
> > workloads. Intel has published a whitepaper about it etc.
> > Uprobes are a very good tool to do
On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 02:15:24PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On 3/30/24 19:02, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > On 3/28/24 19:31, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 10:21:49AM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > > > All the callers of vhost_get_avail_idx() are concerned to the
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 08:27:17PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 22.04.24 20:20, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > Hi David,
> >
> > Thanks for having a look, very much appreciated!
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:27:11AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > On 19.04.24 20:25, David
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:09:43AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Hi Jiri,
>
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:41:59 +0200
> Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > hi,
> > as part of the effort on speeding up the uprobes [0] coming with
> > return uprobe optimization by using syscall instead of the trap
> > on the
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 12:07:29AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:42:06 +0200
> Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> > Adding man page for new uretprobe syscall.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
> > ---
> > man2/uretprobe.2 | 40
> > 1 file
On Tue, Apr 09, 2024 at 09:48:08AM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 4/8/2024 3:45 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:41:20PM +0800, Hou Tao wrote:
> >> From: Hou Tao
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The patch set aims to fix the warning related to an abnormal size
> >>
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 08:57:51AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 5:29 PM Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:28:23PM +0800, Cindy Lu wrote:
> > > Add the function vduse_alloc_reconnnect_info_mem
> > > and vduse_alloc_reconnnect_info_mem
> > > These
Hi Jarkko
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 14:08:44 -0500, Jarkko Sakkinen
wrote:
I did run the basic test by manually creating the cgroup so you could
add tested-by from my side to the other kernel patches expect this one
I've reviewed it enough rounds and given various code suggestions etc.
For me
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 05:49:29PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> @Greg, BTW: should this be stable+noauto...@kernel.org or have a
> 'vger.'
No vger, just stable+whate...@kernel.org.
> in it, e.g. stable+noauto...@vger.kernel.org? I assume without 'vger.'
> is fine, just wanted to be sure,
On 22.04.24 20:11, Guillaume Morin wrote:
(Dropping Mike Kravetz as CC since he has retired and his email is no
longer valid, adding Muchun since he's the current hugetlb maintainer,
as well as linux-trace-kernel)
On 22 Apr 11:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 19.04.24 20:37, Guillaume Morin
Hi Masami and Mike,
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 2:11 AM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > IIUC, we need to update __execmem_cache_alloc() to take a range pointer as
> > > input. module text will use "range" for EXECMEM_MODULE_TEXT, while kprobe
> > > will use "range" for EXECMEM_KPROBE.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:01:03AM +0800, Jason Xing wrote:
...
> diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h
...
> +/**
> + * There are three parts in order:
> + * 1) reset reason in MPTCP: only for MPTCP use
> + * 2) skb drop reason: relying on drop reasons for such as
On 22.04.24 20:20, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
Hi David,
Thanks for having a look, very much appreciated!
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:27:11AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 19.04.24 20:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 06.04.24 19:36, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
In preparation for allowing the
Hi David,
Thanks for having a look, very much appreciated!
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 11:27:11AM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> On 19.04.24 20:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > On 06.04.24 19:36, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> > > In preparation for allowing the user-space to map a ring-buffer, add
>
(Dropping Mike Kravetz as CC since he has retired and his email is no
longer valid, adding Muchun since he's the current hugetlb maintainer,
as well as linux-trace-kernel)
On 22 Apr 11:39, David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 19.04.24 20:37, Guillaume Morin wrote:
> > libhugetlbfs, the Intel iodlr
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 11:43:46PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 09:55:55 +0300
> Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> Thanks for doing this review!
>
> > > +/**
> > > + * struct trace_buffer_meta - Ring-buffer Meta-page description
> > > + * @meta_page_size: Size of
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 19:22:27 -0500, Huang, Kai wrote:
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 20:14 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > I think we can add support for "sgx_cgroup=disabled" in future if
indeed
> > needed. But just for init failure, no?
> >
>
> It's not about the commandline, which we can add in
On 04/21, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 +
> include/linux/syscalls.h | 2 ++
> include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h | 5 -
> kernel/sys_ni.c| 2 ++
> 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Oleg
On 04/21, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c | 115 ++
> include/linux/uprobes.h | 3 +
> kernel/events/uprobes.c | 24 +---
> 3 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov
[CCing Sasha]
On 18.04.24 15:20, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 09:04:53AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 17.04.24 15:38, Greg KH wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 03:21:12PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
On 17.04.24 14:52, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Wed, Apr
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 03:01:25PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> AMD-Xilinx Versal platform is successor of ZynqMP platform.
> Real-time Processing Unit R5 cluster IP on Versal is same as
> of ZynqMP Platform. Power-domains ids for Versal platform is
> different than ZynqMP.
>
> AMD-Xilinx
Hi Olivia,
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 04:42:11PM +0800, Olivia Wen wrote:
> From: "olivia.wen"
>
> There are three primary modifications.
>
> 1. The struct mtk_scp_of_data usage on MT8188
> MT8192 functions are unsuitable for the dual-core MT8188 SCP,
> which has two RISC-V cores similar to
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 03:23:05 -0700
Jonathan Haslam wrote:
> Active uprobes are stored in an RB tree and accesses to this tree are
> dominated by read operations. Currently these accesses are serialized by
> a spinlock but this leads to enormous contention when large numbers of
> threads are
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 13:39:32 +0200
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:23:05AM -0700, Jonathan Haslam wrote:
> > Active uprobes are stored in an RB tree and accesses to this tree are
> > dominated by read operations. Currently these accesses are serialized by
> > a spinlock but this
Hi Jiri,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:41:59 +0200
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> hi,
> as part of the effort on speeding up the uprobes [0] coming with
> return uprobe optimization by using syscall instead of the trap
> on the uretprobe trampoline.
>
> The speed up depends on instruction type that uprobe is
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:42:06 +0200
Jiri Olsa wrote:
> Adding man page for new uretprobe syscall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa
> ---
> man2/uretprobe.2 | 40
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 man2/uretprobe.2
>
> diff --git
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 09:00:31AM -0400, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 12:06:06PM +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> > static bool vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid)
> > {
> >
> > vsock = vhost_vsock_get(remote_cid);
> >
> > if (vsock)
> >
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 02:39:20AM -0700, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit:8cd26fd90c1a Merge tag 'for-6.9-rc4-tag' of git://git.kern..
> git tree: upstream
> console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=102d27cd18
>
On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 12:44:35 +0300
Mike Rapoport wrote:
> From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
>
> kprobes depended on CONFIG_MODULES because it has to allocate memory for
> code.
>
> Since code allocations are now implemented with execmem, kprobes can be
> enabled in non-modular kernels.
>
> Add
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 12:06:06PM +0900, Jeongjun Park wrote:
> static bool vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid)
> {
>
> vsock = vhost_vsock_get(remote_cid);
>
> if (vsock)
> seqpacket_allow = vsock->seqpacket_allow;
>
> }
>
> I think this is due
On 22/4/24 11:44, Mike Rapoport wrote:
From: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)"
execmem does not depend on modules, on the contrary modules use
execmem.
To make execmem available when CONFIG_MODULES=n, for instance for
kprobes, split execmem_params initialization out from
arch/*/kernel/module.c and
On Wed, Apr 10, 2024 at 11:30:20AM +0800, lyx634449800 wrote:
> From: Yuxue Liu
>
> When there is a ctlq and it doesn't require interrupt
> callbacks,the original method of calculating vectors
> wastes hardware msi or msix resources as well as system
> IRQ resources.
>
> When conducting
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:23:05AM -0700, Jonathan Haslam wrote:
> Active uprobes are stored in an RB tree and accesses to this tree are
> dominated by read operations. Currently these accesses are serialized by
> a spinlock but this leads to enormous contention when large numbers of
> threads are
Dear Michael,
I hope this email finds you well. I am reaching out to request your
assistance in reviewing a patch.
The patch in question is titled "[PATCH v5] vp_vdpa: don't allocate
unused msix vectors". I believe your expertise and insights would be invaluable
in ensuring
Il 19/04/24 10:42, Olivia Wen ha scritto:
From: "olivia.wen"
There are three primary modifications.
1. The struct mtk_scp_of_data usage on MT8188
MT8192 functions are unsuitable for the dual-core MT8188 SCP,
which has two RISC-V cores similar to MT8195 but without L1TCM.
We've added
Il 19/04/24 10:42, Olivia Wen ha scritto:
From: "olivia.wen"
Under different applications, the MT8188 SCP can be used as single-core
or dual-core.
Signed-off-by: olivia.wen
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
Il 19/04/24 10:42, Olivia Wen ha scritto:
From: "olivia.wen"
Under different applications, the MT8188 SCP can be used as single-core
or dual-core.
Signed-off-by: olivia.wen
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
On 22/04/2024 11:17, Jason Xing wrote:> On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:47 PM
Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>> On 22/04/2024 05:01, Jason Xing wrote:
>>> From: Jason Xing
(...)
>>> diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h b/include/net/rstreason.h
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index ..c57bc5413c17
On 19.04.24 20:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 06.04.24 19:36, Vincent Donnefort wrote:
In preparation for allowing the user-space to map a ring-buffer, add
a set of mapping functions:
ring_buffer_{map,unmap}()
And controls on the ring-buffer:
ring_buffer_map_get_reader() /* swap
Hello Matthieu,
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 4:47 PM Matthieu Baerts wrote:
>
> Hi Jason,
>
> On 22/04/2024 05:01, Jason Xing wrote:
> > From: Jason Xing
> >
> > Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support
> > both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP
On 22.04.24 09:42, zhenwei pi wrote:
All the VM events related statistics have dependence on
'CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS', once any stack variable is required by any
VM events in future, we would have codes like:
#ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
unsigned long foo;
#endif
...
On 22.04.24 10:04, zhenwei pi wrote:
On 4/22/24 15:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.04.24 09:42, zhenwei pi wrote:
All the VM events related statistics have dependence on
'CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS', once any stack variable is required by any
VM events in future, we would have codes like:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 03:42:51PM +0800, zhenwei pi wrote:
> All the VM events related statistics have dependence on
> 'CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS', once any stack variable is required by any
> VM events in future, we would have codes like:
> #ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
> unsigned long
Hi Jason,
On 22/04/2024 05:01, Jason Xing wrote:
> From: Jason Xing
>
> Add a new standalone file for the easy future extension to support
> both active reset and passive reset in the TCP/DCCP/MPTCP protocols.
Thank you for looking at that!
(...)
> diff --git a/include/net/rstreason.h
Hello,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
> the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
> disabling GSO.
>
> IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
>
On 4/22/24 15:47, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 22.04.24 09:42, zhenwei pi wrote:
All the VM events related statistics have dependence on
'CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS', once any stack variable is required by any
VM events in future, we would have codes like:
#ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
On 22.04.24 09:42, zhenwei pi wrote:
Memory allocation stall counter represents the performance/latency of
memory allocation, expose this counter to the host side by virtio
balloon device via out-of-bound way.
Signed-off-by: zhenwei pi
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 8
On 22.04.24 09:42, zhenwei pi wrote:
All the VM events related statistics have dependence on
'CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS', once any stack variable is required by any
VM events in future, we would have codes like:
#ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
unsigned long foo;
#endif
...
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 1:06 PM Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
Dear Julian,
Thanks a lot for the fast review and suggestions!
Kind regards,
Alex
>
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
>
> > Cc: Julian Anastasov
> > Cc: Simon Horman
> > Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso
> >
Hi, everyone:
Could someone review this patch?
Best regards,
Ainux Wang.
于2024年4月17日周三 13:35写道：
>
> From: Wang Yao
>
> Commit ddb5cdbafaaa ("kbuild: generate KSYMTAB entries by modpost")
> forget drop the .export_symbol section from the final modules.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Yao
> ---
>
On Fri, 2024-04-19 at 20:14 -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
> > > I think we can add support for "sgx_cgroup=disabled" in future if indeed
> > > needed. But just for init failure, no?
> > >
> >
> > It's not about the commandline, which we can add in the future when
> > needed. It's about we need to
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 09:06:11 +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
> Define the USB-C orientation GPIOs so that the USB-C ports orientation
> is known without having to resort to the altmode notifications.
>
> On PCB level this is the signal from PM7250B (pin CC_OUT) which is
> called USB_PHY_PS.
>
>
>
Hello,
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> On 21/Apr/2024 14:01, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> > I'm guessing what should be the Fixes line, may be?:
> >
> > Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support")
>
> This seems like the right one.
>
> > because SCTP GSO was
On 21/Apr/2024 14:01, Julian Anastasov wrote:
<...>
> Thanks for the fix, I'll accept this but skb_is_gso_sctp()
> has comment for pre-condition: skb_is_gso(skb). Can you send v2
> with it?
Thanks; sent!
> I'm guessing what should be the Fixes line, may be?:
>
> Fixes: 90017accff61
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> Let's make all IPVS sysctls writtable even when
> network namespace is owned by non-initial user namespace.
>
> Let's make a few sysctls to be read-only for non-privileged users:
> - sync_qlen_max
> - sync_sock_size
> -
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Alexander Mikhalitsyn wrote:
> Cc: Julian Anastasov
> Cc: Simon Horman
> Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso
> Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik
> Cc: Florian Westphal
> Suggested-by: Julian Anastasov
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Mikhalitsyn
Looks good to me, thanks!
Hello,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024, Ismael Luceno wrote:
> It was observed in the wild that pairs of consecutive packets would leave
> the IPVS with the same wrong checksum, and the issue only went away when
> disabling GSO.
>
> IPVS needs to avoid computing the SCTP checksum when using GSO.
>
On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 08:20:10PM -0700, Haitao Huang wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson
>
> Add initial documentation of how to regulate the distribution of
> SGX Enclave Page Cache (EPC) memory via the Miscellaneous cgroup
> controller.
>
The doc LGTM, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Bagas Sanjaya
Hi zhenwei,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on akpm-mm/mm-everything]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.9-rc4 next-20240419]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to
static bool vhost_transport_seqpacket_allow(u32 remote_cid)
{
vsock = vhost_vsock_get(remote_cid);
if (vsock)
seqpacket_allow = vsock->seqpacket_allow;
}
I think this is due to reading a previously created uninitialized
vsock->seqpacket_allow inside
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 10:59:09 -0700
Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 6:00 PM Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 12:09:09 -0700
> > Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
> >
> > > Take into account CONFIG_FTRACE_VALIDATE_RCU_IS_WATCHING when validating
> > > that RCU is
1 - 100 of 2409528 matches
Mail list logo
