On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:06:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > @@ -65,1 +60,1 @@
> > > - depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI ||
> > X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
> > > + depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
> > > ---
> >
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:36:48PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI'
> > >
> > > error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65
> > > error:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI'
> >
> > error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65
> > error: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig: patch does not apply
>
> I made the
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Adrian,
> This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Dave Jones <[EMAIL
On Sun, Jul 01, 2007 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Adrian,
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI'
error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65
error: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig: patch does not apply
I made the patch against
On Mon, Jul 02, 2007 at 08:36:48PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 01:43:13AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Applying '[CPUFREQ] the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI'
error: patch failed: arch/x86_64/kernel/cpufreq/Kconfig:65
error:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2007 at 03:06:11AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
@@ -65,1 +60,1 @@
- depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI ||
X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
+ depends on X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ || X86_POWERNOW_K8_ACPI
---
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which
> are
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which
are only a few years old, if you noted what replaces this functionality.
Yes,
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:38:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Adrian
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
lets kill this in 2.6.22
Dave
--
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lets kill this in 2.6.22
Dave
--
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lets kill this in
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:38:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
On Fri, 6 Apr 2007, Dave Jones wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 12:19:28PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which
are only a few years old, if you noted what replaces this functionality.
Yes, people
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 06:30:58PM -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
This patch contains the overdue removal of X86_SPEEDSTEP_CENTRINO_ACPI.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be really nice, when removing features used on computers which
are only a few
Ack.
Dave: Can you add this patch to cpufreq.git -> mm.
Thanks,
Venki
>-Original Message-
>From: Adrian Bunk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:07 PM
>To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>Subject:
Ack.
Dave: Can you add this patch to cpufreq.git - mm.
Thanks,
Venki
-Original Message-
From: Adrian Bunk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 4:07 PM
To: Pallipadi, Venkatesh
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6
20 matches
Mail list logo
