Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-12-19 Thread Chris Mason
On 18 Dec 2018, at 13:57, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 12/18/18 2:11 AM, kemi wrote: >> Hi, All >> Do we have special reason to keep this patch (316ba5736c9:brd: Mark >> as non-rotational). >> which leads to a performance regression when BRD is used as a disk on >> btrfs. > > I really suspect that t

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-12-18 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/18/18 2:11 AM, kemi wrote: > Hi, All > Do we have special reason to keep this patch (316ba5736c9:brd: Mark as > non-rotational). > which leads to a performance regression when BRD is used as a disk on btrfs. I really suspect that this is a btrfs issue, as this is just flagging what is pre

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-12-18 Thread kemi
Hi, All Do we have special reason to keep this patch (316ba5736c9:brd: Mark as non-rotational). which leads to a performance regression when BRD is used as a disk on btrfs. On 2018/7/10 下午1:27, kemi wrote: > Hi, SeongJae > Do you have any input for this regression? thanks > > On 2018年06月04日

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-07-27 Thread SeongJae Park
.@fb.com; > > l...@01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% > > regression > > > > Oops, I mistakenly found this mail now. I will look inside for this though > > it will take some time

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-07-27 Thread Jens Axboe
ent: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 12:53 AM > To: Wang, Kemi > Cc: Ye, Xiaolong ; ax...@kernel.dk; ax...@fb.com; > l...@01.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% > regression > > Oops, I mistakenly found this m

RE: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-07-26 Thread Wang, Kemi
: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression Oops, I mistakenly found this mail now. I will look inside for this though it will take some time because I will not be in office for this week. Thanks, SeongJae Park On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:30 AM kemi wrote: > &

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-07-10 Thread SeongJae Park
Oops, I mistakenly found this mail now. I will look inside for this though it will take some time because I will not be in office for this week. Thanks, SeongJae Park On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 1:30 AM kemi wrote: > > Hi, SeongJae > Do you have any input for this regression? thanks > > On 2018年0

Re: [LKP] [lkp-robot] [brd] 316ba5736c: aim7.jobs-per-min -11.2% regression

2018-07-09 Thread kemi
Hi, SeongJae Do you have any input for this regression? thanks On 2018年06月04日 13:52, kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -11.2% regression of aim7.jobs-per-min due to commit: > > > commit: 316ba5736c9caa5dbcd84085989862d2df57431d ("brd: Mark as > non-rotational") >