RE: [PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Use fixed IRQ bases to avoid conflicts on Cragganmore
Mark Brown wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote: > > There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign > > its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the > > statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically > > assigned one. Fix this by statically assigning both the IRQ bases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax > > Reviwed-by: Mark Brown > Thanks for your review. > This probably wants to go to stable as well. OK, I'll. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
RE: [PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Use fixed IRQ bases to avoid conflicts on Cragganmore
Mark Brown wrote: On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote: There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically assigned one. Fix this by statically assigning both the IRQ bases. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Reviwed-by: Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org Thanks for your review. This probably wants to go to stable as well. OK, I'll. Thanks, Kukjin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Re: [PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Use fixed IRQ bases to avoid conflicts on Cragganmore
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote: > There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign > its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the > statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically > assigned one. Fix this by statically assigning both the IRQ bases. > > Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax Reviwed-by: Mark Brown This probably wants to go to stable as well. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH] ARM: S3C64XX: Use fixed IRQ bases to avoid conflicts on Cragganmore
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 10:40:41AM +, Charles Keepax wrote: There are two PMICs on Cragganmore, currently one dynamically assign its IRQ base and the other uses a fixed base. It is possible for the statically assigned PMIC to fail if its IRQ is taken by the dynamically assigned one. Fix this by statically assigning both the IRQ bases. Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com Reviwed-by: Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org This probably wants to go to stable as well. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
