On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 16:59:05, Porter, Matt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:57:08AM +, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 21:50:20, Porter, Matt wrote:
> > > On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to four GPIO instances that
> > > are 0-based, GPIO0-3.
> > >
> >
> >
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:57:08AM +, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 21:50:20, Porter, Matt wrote:
> > On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to four GPIO instances that
> > are 0-based, GPIO0-3.
> >
>
> Thanks Matt,
> I think Anil labeled it as gpio1-4 due to hwmod
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:57:08AM +, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 21:50:20, Porter, Matt wrote:
On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to four GPIO instances that
are 0-based, GPIO0-3.
Thanks Matt,
I think Anil labeled it as gpio1-4 due to hwmod naming
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 16:59:05, Porter, Matt wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 04:57:08AM +, Hiremath, Vaibhav wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 21:50:20, Porter, Matt wrote:
On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to four GPIO instances that
are 0-based, GPIO0-3.
Thanks Matt,
I
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 22:29:21, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 06:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >> + Tony
> >>
> >> Hi Matt,
> >>
> >> 30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
> >>
> >> There are a couple of am33xx
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 21:50:20, Porter, Matt wrote:
> On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to four GPIO instances that
> are 0-based, GPIO0-3.
>
Thanks Matt,
I think Anil labeled it as gpio1-4 due to hwmod naming convention, as you
can not have gpioo id = 0 (refer to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:59:21PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> On 09/10/2012 06:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> >> + Tony
> >>
> >> Hi Matt,
> >>
> >> 30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
> >>
> >> There are a couple of
* Benoit Cousson [120910 09:35]:
> + Tony
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> 30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
>
> There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
> and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this is not too late for Tony.
Yes please do, it' hard to say when
On 09/10/2012 06:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
>> + Tony
>>
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> 30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
>>
>> There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
>> and send a for_3.7/dts-part2
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
> + Tony
>
> Hi Matt,
>
> 30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
>
> There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
> and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this is not too late for Tony.
Yeah,
+ Tony
Hi Matt,
30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this is not too late for Tony.
On 09/10/2012 06:20 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
> On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer
+ Tony
Hi Matt,
30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this is not too late for Tony.
On 09/10/2012 06:20 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ Tony
Hi Matt,
30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this is not too late for Tony.
Yeah, believe
On 09/10/2012 06:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ Tony
Hi Matt,
30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this
* Benoit Cousson b-cous...@ti.com [120910 09:35]:
+ Tony
Hi Matt,
30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so I'll take them
and send a for_3.7/dts-part2 pull request if this is not too late for Tony.
Yes please do, it' hard to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:59:21PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
On 09/10/2012 06:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ Tony
Hi Matt,
30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
There are a couple of am33xx patches under
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 21:50:20, Porter, Matt wrote:
On AM33xx, the datasheet and TRM refer to four GPIO instances that
are 0-based, GPIO0-3.
Thanks Matt,
I think Anil labeled it as gpio1-4 due to hwmod naming convention, as you
can not have gpioo id = 0 (refer to
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 22:29:21, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
On 09/10/2012 06:52 PM, Matt Porter wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 06:34:20PM +0200, Benoit Cousson wrote:
+ Tony
Hi Matt,
30 minutes too late for my pull request :-(
There are a couple of am33xx patches under discussion, so
18 matches
Mail list logo
