On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 11:36:21AM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:34:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> > > considering the issue of type promotion. The "if_version_length"
> > > variable is type
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:34:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> > considering the issue of type promotion. The "if_version_length"
> > variable is type size_t so if __mei_cl_recv() returns a negative then
> > "bytes_recv" is
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 12:34:49PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> considering the issue of type promotion. The "if_version_length"
> variable is type size_t so if __mei_cl_recv() returns a negative then
> "bytes_recv" is type promoted
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:57:44PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > We accidenta
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:57:44PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> > > > > c
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:57:44PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > >
> > > > We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> > > > considering the issu
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >
> > > We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> > > considering the issue of type promotion. The "if_version_length"
> > > variable is type size_t so i
On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:59:14PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>
> > We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> > considering the issue of type promotion. The "if_version_length"
> > variable is type size_t so if __mei_cl_recv(
On Wed, 4 Jul 2018, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We accidentally removed the check for negative returns without
> considering the issue of type promotion. The "if_version_length"
> variable is type size_t so if __mei_cl_recv() returns a negative then
> "bytes_recv" is type promoted to a high positiv
9 matches
Mail list logo