Re: [PATCH] qed: fix missing break in OOO_LB_TC case

2017-04-06 Thread David Miller
From: Colin King Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:35:44 +0100 > From: Colin Ian King > > There seems to be a missing break on the OOO_LB_TC case, pq_id > is being assigned and then re-assigned on the fall through default > case and that seems

Re: [PATCH] qed: fix missing break in OOO_LB_TC case

2017-04-06 Thread David Miller
From: Colin King Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:35:44 +0100 > From: Colin Ian King > > There seems to be a missing break on the OOO_LB_TC case, pq_id > is being assigned and then re-assigned on the fall through default > case and that seems suspect. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1424402

RE: [PATCH] qed: fix missing break in OOO_LB_TC case

2017-04-05 Thread Mintz, Yuval
> There seems to be a missing break on the OOO_LB_TC case, pq_id is being > assigned and then re-assigned on the fall through default case and that > seems suspect. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1424402 ("Missing break in switch") > > Fixes: b5a9ee7cf3be1 ("qed: Revise QM cofiguration") > >

RE: [PATCH] qed: fix missing break in OOO_LB_TC case

2017-04-05 Thread Mintz, Yuval
> There seems to be a missing break on the OOO_LB_TC case, pq_id is being > assigned and then re-assigned on the fall through default case and that > seems suspect. > > Detected by CoverityScan, CID#1424402 ("Missing break in switch") > > Fixes: b5a9ee7cf3be1 ("qed: Revise QM cofiguration") > >