On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:39:11 +0400 Vyacheslav Dubeyko
wrote:
> [snip]
> > >
> > > And Would you share ppt or document of f2fs if Korea Linux Forum is
> > > finished ?
> > >
> >
> > Here I attached the slides, and LF will also share the slides.
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> I had hope that slides
On Thu, 18 Oct 2012 17:39:11 +0400 Vyacheslav Dubeyko sl...@dubeyko.com
wrote:
[snip]
And Would you share ppt or document of f2fs if Korea Linux Forum is
finished ?
Here I attached the slides, and LF will also share the slides.
Thanks,
I had hope that slides will have
> [snip]
> > >
> > > And Would you share ppt or document of f2fs if Korea Linux Forum is
> > > finished ?
> > >
> >
> > Here I attached the slides, and LF will also share the slides.
> > Thanks,
> >
>
> I had hope that slides will have more detailed description. Maybe it is
> good for Linux
[snip]
> >
> > And Would you share ppt or document of f2fs if Korea Linux Forum is
> > finished ?
> >
>
> Here I attached the slides, and LF will also share the slides.
> Thanks,
>
I had hope that slides will have more detailed description. Maybe it is
good for Linux Forum. But do you plan
[snip]
And Would you share ppt or document of f2fs if Korea Linux Forum is
finished ?
Here I attached the slides, and LF will also share the slides.
Thanks,
I had hope that slides will have more detailed description. Maybe it is
good for Linux Forum. But do you plan to publish
[snip]
And Would you share ppt or document of f2fs if Korea Linux Forum is
finished ?
Here I attached the slides, and LF will also share the slides.
Thanks,
I had hope that slides will have more detailed description. Maybe it is
good for Linux Forum. But do you plan to
el@vger.kernel.org;
> chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com; jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> 2012/10/11, Changman Lee :
> > 2012년 10월 11일 목요일에 Namjae
2012/10/11, Changman Lee :
> 2012년 10월 11일 목요일에 Namjae Jeon님이 작성:
>> 2012/10/10 Jaegeuk Kim :
>>
I mean that every volume is placed inside any partition (MTD or GPT).
> Every partition begins from any
physical sector. So, as I can understand, f2fs volume can begin from
> physical
2012/10/13, Jaegeuk Kim :
> 2012-10-13 (토), 13:26 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
>> Is there high possibility that the storage device can be rapidly
>> worn-out by cleaning process ? e.g. severe fragmentation situation by
>> creating and removing small files.
>>
>
> Yes, the cleaning process in F2FS induces
2012/10/13, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@gmail.com:
2012-10-13 (토), 13:26 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
Is there high possibility that the storage device can be rapidly
worn-out by cleaning process ? e.g. severe fragmentation situation by
creating and removing small files.
Yes, the cleaning process in
2012/10/11, Changman Lee cm224@gmail.com:
2012년 10월 11일 목요일에 Namjae Jeonlinkinj...@gmail.com님이 작성:
2012/10/10 Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
I mean that every volume is placed inside any partition (MTD or GPT).
Every partition begins from any
physical sector. So, as I can
@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com; jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/11, Changman Lee cm224@gmail.com:
2012년 10월 11일 목요일에 Namjae Jeonlinkinj...@gmail.com님이 작성:
2012/10/10 Jaegeuk
2012-10-13 (토), 13:26 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
> Is there high possibility that the storage device can be rapidly
> worn-out by cleaning process ? e.g. severe fragmentation situation by
> creating and removing small files.
>
Yes, the cleaning process in F2FS induces additional writes so that
flash
2012-10-13 (토), 13:26 +0900, Namjae Jeon:
Is there high possibility that the storage device can be rapidly
worn-out by cleaning process ? e.g. severe fragmentation situation by
creating and removing small files.
Yes, the cleaning process in F2FS induces additional writes so that
flash
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 11:36:14 David Woodhouse wrote:
> The whole thing is silly. What we actually want on an embedded system is
> to ditch the FTL altogether and have direct access to the NAND. Then we
> can know our file system is behaving optimally. And we don't need
> hacks like TRIM to
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 00:53:51 Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:01:24PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> > Do not get me wrong, I do not think it is worth to wait for vendors
> > to come to their senses, but it is worth constantly reminding that
> > we *need* this kind of
2012-10-12 (금), 16:30 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
> On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 18:43 +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > [snip]
> > > > How about the following scenario?
> > > > 1. data "a" is newly written.
> > > > 2. checkpoint "A" is done.
> > > > 3. data "a" is truncated.
> > > > 4. checkpoint "B" is
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 18:43 +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> [snip]
> > > How about the following scenario?
> > > 1. data "a" is newly written.
> > > 2. checkpoint "A" is done.
> > > 3. data "a" is truncated.
> > > 4. checkpoint "B" is done.
> > >
> > > If fs supports multiple snapshots like "A" and
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 18:43 +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
[snip]
How about the following scenario?
1. data a is newly written.
2. checkpoint A is done.
3. data a is truncated.
4. checkpoint B is done.
If fs supports multiple snapshots like A and B to users, it cannot
reuse
2012-10-12 (금), 16:30 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 18:43 +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
[snip]
How about the following scenario?
1. data a is newly written.
2. checkpoint A is done.
3. data a is truncated.
4. checkpoint B is done.
If fs supports
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 00:53:51 Theodore Ts'o wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:01:24PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
Do not get me wrong, I do not think it is worth to wait for vendors
to come to their senses, but it is worth constantly reminding that
we *need* this kind of information
On Wednesday 10 October 2012 11:36:14 David Woodhouse wrote:
The whole thing is silly. What we actually want on an embedded system is
to ditch the FTL altogether and have direct access to the NAND. Then we
can know our file system is behaving optimally. And we don't need
hacks like TRIM to try
2012/10/10 Jaegeuk Kim :
>>
>> I mean that every volume is placed inside any partition (MTD or GPT). Every
>> partition begins from any
>> physical sector. So, as I can understand, f2fs volume can begin from
>> physical sector that is laid
>> inside physical erase block. Thereby, in such case
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 10:31 +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> I am sorry but this reply makes me smile. How can you design a fs
> relying on time attack heuristics to figure out what the proper
> layout should be ? Or even endorse such heuristics to be used in
> mkfs ? What we should be focusing on is
[snip]
> > How about the following scenario?
> > 1. data "a" is newly written.
> > 2. checkpoint "A" is done.
> > 3. data "a" is truncated.
> > 4. checkpoint "B" is done.
> >
> > If fs supports multiple snapshots like "A" and "B" to users, it cannot
> > reuse the space allocated by
> > data "a"
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:53:26PM -0500, Jooyoung Hwang wrote:
> I'd like you to refer to the following link as well which is about
> mobile workload pattern.
> http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fuyaoz/courses/15712/report.pdf
> It's reported that in Android there are frequent issues of fsync and
> most of
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:01:24PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> Do not get me wrong, I do not think it is worth to wait for vendors
> to come to their senses, but it is worth constantly reminding that
> we *need* this kind of information and those heuristics are not
> feasible in the long run
Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Cc: 'Marco Stornelli'; 'Jaegeuk Kim'; 'Al Viro'; ty...@mit.edu;
> > > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
> > > ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> > > jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> > > linux-fsde...@
Viro'; ty...@mit.edu;
> > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> > jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> > linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
NILFS2 is one of major log-structured file systems, which supports
multiple snap
'; 'Al Viro'; ty...@mit.edu;
gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
I'd like you
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:01:24PM +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
Do not get me wrong, I do not think it is worth to wait for vendors
to come to their senses, but it is worth constantly reminding that
we *need* this kind of information and those heuristics are not
feasible in the long run anyway.
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:53:26PM -0500, Jooyoung Hwang wrote:
I'd like you to refer to the following link as well which is about
mobile workload pattern.
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~fuyaoz/courses/15712/report.pdf
It's reported that in Android there are frequent issues of fsync and
most of them
[snip]
How about the following scenario?
1. data a is newly written.
2. checkpoint A is done.
3. data a is truncated.
4. checkpoint B is done.
If fs supports multiple snapshots like A and B to users, it cannot
reuse the space allocated by
data a after checkpoint B even though
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 10:31 +0200, Lukáš Czerner wrote:
I am sorry but this reply makes me smile. How can you design a fs
relying on time attack heuristics to figure out what the proper
layout should be ? Or even endorse such heuristics to be used in
mkfs ? What we should be focusing on is to
2012/10/10 Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
I mean that every volume is placed inside any partition (MTD or GPT). Every
partition begins from any
physical sector. So, as I can understand, f2fs volume can begin from
physical sector that is laid
inside physical erase block. Thereby, in
ko'; 'Marco Stornelli';
> 'Jaegeuk Kim'; 'Al Viro';
> ty...@mit.edu; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> chur@samsung.com;
> cm224@samsung.com; jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-fri
[ Folks, can you trim your responses down to just quote the part you
are responding to? Having to repeatedly scroll through 500 lines of
irrelevant text just to find the 5 lines that is being commented on
is exceedingly painful. ]
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:01:18PM +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >
Viro'; ty...@mit.edu;
> > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
> > ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> > jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> > linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
> >
2012-10-09 (화), 14:39 +0200, Lukáš Czerner:
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As you can see the f2fs kernel document patch, I think one of
> > > > > > > > the most
> > > > > > > > important features is to align operating units between f2fs and
> > > > >
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As you can see the f2fs kernel document patch, I think one of the
> > > > > > > most
> > > > > > > important features is to align operating units between f2fs and
> > > > > > > ftl.
> > > > > > > Specifically, f2fs has section
foundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> chur@samsung.com;
> cm224@samsung.com; jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> chur@samsung.com, cm224@samsung.com, jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com,
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> > -Original Message-
euk Kim';
> 'Al Viro'; ty...@mit.edu;
> gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
x-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> chur@samsung.com, cm224@samsung.com, jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com,
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Namjae Jeon [mailto:li
.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> 2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim :
> >> -Original Message--
chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> Hi,
>
> On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> >> -Original
@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
Hi,
On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko [mailto:sl...@dubeyko.com]
Sent
@vger.kernel.org;
chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
-Original Message-
From: Namjae Jeon [mailto:linkinj
@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
-Original Message-
From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko [mailto:sl
...@mit.edu;
gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
On Mon, 8 Oct 2012, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Date
...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
chur@samsung.com;
cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
-Original
@vger.kernel.org;
chur@samsung.com;
cm224@samsung.com; jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2012 19:45:57 +0900
From: Jaegeuk Kim
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
As you can see the f2fs kernel document patch, I think one of the
most
important features is to align operating units between f2fs and
ftl.
Specifically, f2fs has section and zone, which are cleaning unit
2012-10-09 (화), 14:39 +0200, Lukáš Czerner:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2012, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
As you can see the f2fs kernel document patch, I think one of
the most
important features is to align operating units between f2fs and
ftl.
Specifically, f2fs has
; linux-
ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
Hi,
On Oct 8, 2012, at 12:25 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
-Original Message
[ Folks, can you trim your responses down to just quote the part you
are responding to? Having to repeatedly scroll through 500 lines of
irrelevant text just to find the 5 lines that is being commented on
is exceedingly painful. ]
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 09:01:18PM +0900, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
'; 'Al Viro';
ty...@mit.edu; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
chur@samsung.com;
cm224@samsung.com; jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
[ Folks, can you trim your
; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
>> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>>
>> 2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim :
>> gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
>> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
>> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
ernel.org;
> chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> 2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim :
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Namjae J
; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
>> chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
>> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>>
>> 2012/10/8, Jaege
ernel.org;
> chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> 2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim :
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Vyacheslav D
.@linuxfoundation.org; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
>> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
>> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Oct 7,
chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> Hi,
>
> On Oct 7, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>
> >> -Original Messag
@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marco Stornelli [mailto:marco.storne...@gmail.com]
Sent
...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marco Stornelli
; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
-Original Message-
From: Vyacheslav Dubeyko [mailto:sl...@dubeyko.com]
Sent: Sunday
-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
-Original Message-
From: Vyacheslav
; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
-Original Message-
From: Namjae Jeon [mailto:linkinj...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday
...@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2012, at 1:31 PM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Marco
-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com; linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
2012/10/8, Jaegeuk Kim jaegeuk@samsung.com:
-Original Message-
From: Namjae Jeon
l Viro; ty...@mit.edu;
>> gre...@linuxfoundation.org;
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
>> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
>> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>>
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> 2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
>> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> Hi.
> We know each other, right? :)
>
Yes, you are correct. :-)
>>
>>> From: 김재극
>>> To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' ,
>>>
vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
> linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
>
> Il 06/10/2012 22:06, Jaegeuk Kim ha scritto:
> > 2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyach
Il 06/10/2012 22:06, Jaegeuk Kim ha scritto:
2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
Hi Jaegeuk,
Hi.
We know each other, right? :)
From: 김재극
To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' ,
gre...@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Il 06/10/2012 22:06, Jaegeuk Kim ha scritto:
2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
Hi Jaegeuk,
Hi.
We know each other, right? :)
From: 김재극 jaegeuk@samsung.com
To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' ty...@mit.edu,
gre...@linuxfoundation.org,
; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
Il 06/10/2012 22:06, Jaegeuk Kim ha scritto:
2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
Hi Jaegeuk,
Hi.
We know each other
Hi,
On Oct 7, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
Hi Jaegeuk,
Hi.
We know each other, right? :)
Yes, you are correct. :-)
From: 김재극 jaegeuk@samsung.com
To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o'
;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; chur@samsung.com; cm224@samsung.com;
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com;
linux-fsde...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16] f2fs: introduce flash-friendly file system
Il 06/10/2012 22:06, Jaegeuk Kim ha scritto:
2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav
2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
Hi.
We know each other, right? :)
>
> > From: 김재극
> > To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' ,
> > gre...@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> > chur@samsung.com,
Hi Jaegeuk,
> From: 김재극
> To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' ,
> gre...@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
> chur@samsung.com, cm224@samsung.com, jaegeuk@samsung.com,
> jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com
> Subject: [PATCH 00/16]
Hi Jaegeuk,
From: 김재극 jaegeuk@samsung.com
To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' ty...@mit.edu,
gre...@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
chur@samsung.com, cm224@samsung.com, jaegeuk@samsung.com,
jooyoung.hw...@samsung.com
Subject:
2012-10-06 (토), 17:54 +0400, Vyacheslav Dubeyko:
Hi Jaegeuk,
Hi.
We know each other, right? :)
From: 김재극 jaegeuk@samsung.com
To: v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk, 'Theodore Ts'o' ty...@mit.edu,
gre...@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
84 matches
Mail list logo
