2021 10:20 AM
> > > To: Ryan Chen ; Michael Turquette
> > > ; Stephen Boyd ;
> > > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > > andre...@au1.ibm.com; BMC-SW
> > > Cc: j...@jms.id.au; Andrew Jeffery
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH
er.kernel.org;
> > andre...@au1.ibm.com; BMC-SW
> > Cc: j...@jms.id.au; Andrew Jeffery
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for
> > ast2600-A2
> >
> > On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 18:08 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > > AST2600A1/
w Jeffery
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] clk: aspeed: Fix APLL calculate formula for
> ast2600-A2
>
> On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 18:08 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
> > AST2600A1/A2 have different pll calculate formula.
>
> To clarify, only the A0 has the old calculation, and all s
On Mon, 2021-01-18 at 18:08 +0800, Ryan Chen wrote:
> AST2600A1/A2 have different pll calculate formula.
To clarify, only the A0 has the old calculation, and all subsequent
revisions use the new calculation?
If this is the case, do we need to support A0 in mainline linux, or
should we drop
4 matches
Mail list logo
