Hi Srinivasan,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.17-rc2]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180426]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Srinivasan,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.17-rc2]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180426]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Srinivasan,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on v4.17-rc2]
[also build test WARNING on next-20180426]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Srinivasan,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on v4.17-rc2]
[also build test WARNING on next-20180426]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
verproject.org; o...@aepfle.de;
> a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de;
> h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>; Michael
> Kelley (EOSG) <michael.h.kel...@microsoft.com>; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] X86: Hyper-V: Enable
asow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de;
> h...@zytor.com; Stephen Hemminger ; Michael
> Kelley (EOSG) ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] X86: Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:12:47AM -0700, k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> >
.@canonical.com;
> jasow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de; h...@zytor.com; Stephen
> Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] X86: Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: k...@linuxonh
asow...@redhat.com; t...@linutronix.de; h...@zytor.com; Stephen
> Hemminger ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] X86: Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: k...@linuxonhyperv.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, Apri
Hi Srinivasan,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.17-rc2]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180426]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Srinivasan,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on v4.17-rc2]
[also build test ERROR on next-20180426]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
verproject.org; o...@aepfle.de;
> a...@canonical.com; jasow...@redhat.com; h...@zytor.com; Stephen
> Hemminger <sthem...@microsoft.com>; Michael Kelley (EOSG)
> <michael.h.kel...@microsoft.com>; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] X86: Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments
asow...@redhat.com; h...@zytor.com; Stephen
> Hemminger ; Michael Kelley (EOSG)
> ; vkuzn...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] X86: Hyper-V: Enable IPI enlightenments
>
> On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> > +static int __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *ma
> -Original Message-
> From: k...@linuxonhyperv.com
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 11:13 AM
> To: x...@kernel.org; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de; a...@canonical.com;
>
> -Original Message-
> From: k...@linuxonhyperv.com
> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 11:13 AM
> To: x...@kernel.org; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@linuxdriverproject.org; o...@aepfle.de; a...@canonical.com;
> jasow...@redhat.com;
> t...@linutronix.de;
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> +static int __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + int cur_cpu, vcpu;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex **arg;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex *ipi_arg;
> + int ret = 1;
So this indicates whether __send_ipi_mask()
On Wed, 25 Apr 2018, k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> +static int __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + int cur_cpu, vcpu;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex **arg;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex *ipi_arg;
> + int ret = 1;
So this indicates whether __send_ipi_mask()
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:12:47AM -0700, k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> +/*
> + * IPI implementation on Hyper-V.
> + */
> +
> +static int __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + int cur_cpu, vcpu;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex **arg;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:12:47AM -0700, k...@linuxonhyperv.com wrote:
> +/*
> + * IPI implementation on Hyper-V.
> + */
> +
> +static int __send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, int vector)
> +{
> + int cur_cpu, vcpu;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex **arg;
> + struct ipi_arg_non_ex
18 matches
Mail list logo