Hi, Shawn,
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:22:56AM +, Huan Wang wrote:
> > Hi, Shawn,
> >
> > > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Huan Wang
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I need Fabio's confirmation about removing CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A
> from
> > > imx_v6_v7_config.
> > > >
> > > > Fabio, Do you a
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 08:22:56AM +, Huan Wang wrote:
> Hi, Shawn,
>
> > On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Huan Wang
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I need Fabio's confirmation about removing CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A from
> > imx_v6_v7_config.
> > >
> > > Fabio, Do you agree it?
> >
> > Yes, if Shawn accept
Hi, Shawn,
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Huan Wang
> wrote:
>
> > I need Fabio's confirmation about removing CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A from
> imx_v6_v7_config.
> >
> > Fabio, Do you agree it?
>
> Yes, if Shawn accepts ls1021a_defconfig then we should remove
> CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_con
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 5:04 AM, Huan Wang wrote:
> I need Fabio's confirmation about removing CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A from
> imx_v6_v7_config.
>
> Fabio, Do you agree it?
Yes, if Shawn accepts ls1021a_defconfig then we should remove
CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_config.
Regards,
Fabio Estevam
On 8/28/2015 11:04 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
> Hi, Horia,
>
>> On 8/17/2015 6:42 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
>>> Hi, Fabio,
>>
>> Please don't top post.
>>
>>>
>>> Based on the analysis and discussion, we prefer to use
>> ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
>>
>> A
Hi, Horia,
> On 8/17/2015 6:42 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
> > Hi, Fabio,
>
> Please don't top post.
>
> >
> > Based on the analysis and discussion, we prefer to use
> ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
>
> Alison, when you submit v4 for this patch (adding
> CONF
On 8/17/2015 6:42 AM, Wang Huan-B18965 wrote:
> Hi, Fabio,
Please don't top post.
>
> Based on the analysis and discussion, we prefer to use
> ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
Alison, when you submit v4 for this patch (adding
CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT=y a
Hi, Fabio,
Based on the analysis and discussion, we prefer to use
ls1021a_defconfig and remove LS1021A from imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
Thanks.
Best Regards,
Alison Wang
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Horia Geantă
> wrote:
>
> > Another thing:
> > Commit 385c0fb0e2c4 ("ARM: imx_
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Horia Geantă
wrote:
> Another thing:
> Commit 385c0fb0e2c4 ("ARM: imx_v6_v7_defconfig: Select LS1021A") added
> CONFIG_SOC_LS1021A in imx_v6_v7_defconfig.
>
> Besides this, booting a LS1021 AQDS board (Rev2) using
> imx_v6_v7_defconfig did not work (stuck at "Star
On 8/12/2015 4:20 PM, Horia Geantă wrote:
> On 8/7/2015 1:03 PM, Alison Wang wrote:
>> Add Freescale LS1021A initial defconfig file.
>> The LS1021A SoC is a dual-core Cortex-A7 based processor.
>>
>> LS1021A has some special configure options against common V7 SOCs,
>> such as CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL,
On 8/7/2015 1:03 PM, Alison Wang wrote:
> Add Freescale LS1021A initial defconfig file.
> The LS1021A SoC is a dual-core Cortex-A7 based processor.
>
> LS1021A has some special configure options against common V7 SOCs,
> such as CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL, CONFIG_VMSPLIT_2G, CONFIG_VFP...
>
> Enable I2
11 matches
Mail list logo