On 20 October 2014 11:20, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
>> > Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
>> > whether we need Save/restore them.
>> >
>> But how do you handle it for
On 20 October 2014 11:20, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
whether we need Save/restore them.
But how do you handle it
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
>> > Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
>> > whether we need Save/restore them.
>> >
>> But how do you handle
el.org'; mathieu.poir...@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
> notifier
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > > Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
> > whether we need Save/restore them.
> >
> But how do you handle it for different idle states. e.g. if CPU is in
> retention,
...@vger.kernel.org' Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf:
save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
I will prepare another patch to add DT description under
PMU since there is no generic power domain support for pm
notifier if no other concerns. We
; Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
> notifier
>
> On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > > > > I will prepare another patch to add DT description under PMU
> > > > > since there is no gen
: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
notifier
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
I will prepare another patch to add DT description under PMU
since there is no generic power domain support for pm notifier
if no other
concerns.
We can change
...@vger.kernel.org' Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf:
save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
I will prepare another patch to add DT description under
PMU since there is no generic power domain support for pm
notifier if no other concerns. We
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
whether we need Save/restore them.
But how do you handle it for different idle states. e.g. if CPU is in
retention, PMU's
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
notifier
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
whether we need Save/restore them.
But how do
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 10:16:16AM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 20/10/14 09:46, Neil Zhang wrote:
Will, I prefer to check always-on field under PMU node to check
whether we need Save/restore them.
But how do you
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > > > I will prepare another patch to add DT description under PMU since
> > > > there is no generic power domain support for pm notifier if no other
> > > concerns.
> > > > We can change the manner if there is generic power domain
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
I will prepare another patch to add DT description under PMU since
there is no generic power domain support for pm notifier if no other
concerns.
We can change the manner if there is generic power domain support
for
.org.uk';
> > 'linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org';
> > 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'; 'devicet...@vger.kernel.org'
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
> > notifier
> >
> >
> >
> > On 14/05/14 03:28, Neil Zhang wr
'; 'devicet...@vger.kernel.org'
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
notifier
On 14/05/14 03:28, Neil Zhang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
Sent: 2014年5月14日 2:45
To: Neil Zhang
Cc: Sudeep Holla
et...@vger.kernel.org'
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
>
>
>
> On 14/05/14 03:28, Neil Zhang wrote:
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
> >> Sent:
: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
On 14/05/14 03:28, Neil Zhang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
Sent: 2014年5月14日 2:45
To: Neil Zhang
Cc: Sudeep Holla; 'li...@arm.linux.org.uk';
'linux-arm-ker
'
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1]
Thanks for the information.
But it currently for device only, core related stuff
'
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1]
Thanks for the information.
But it currently for device only, core related stuff
; Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > > > The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1]
> > >
> > > Thanks for the information
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > > The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1]
> >
> > Thanks for the information.
> > But it currently for device only, core related stuff are not supported.
> > And is it really good to register power provider
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1]
Thanks for the information.
But it currently for device only, core related stuff are not supported.
And is it really good to register power provider for core
: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 11:22:09AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
The device tree bindings for power domains is under discussion [1]
Thanks for the information.
But it currently for device only, core related stuff are not supported
x.org.uk;
> > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
> > notifier
> >
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > On 30/04/14 03:21
...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
notifier
Hi Neil,
On 30/04/14 03:21, Neil Zhang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
[...]
I think we need some input from the device-tree guys
.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 30/04/14 03:21, Neil Zhang wrote:
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
>
> [...]
>
: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
Hi Neil,
On 30/04/14 03:21, Neil Zhang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
[...]
I think we need some input from the device-tree guys to see whether
they would object to us
Hi Neil,
On 30/04/14 03:21, Neil Zhang wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
[...]
>>
>> I think we need some input from the device-tree guys to see whether they
>> would object to us solving this locally (in the PMU node) or not.
>>
Hi Neil,
On 30/04/14 03:21, Neil Zhang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
[...]
I think we need some input from the device-tree guys to see whether they
would object to us solving this locally (in the PMU node) or not.
Personally, I'd much
; > To: Neil Zhang
> > > Cc: li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> > > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sudeep Holla;
> > > devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
&
;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sudeep Holla;
devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm
notifier
Hi Neil,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
This adds core support for saving and restoring CPU PMU
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sudeep Holla; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
> >
> > Hi Neil,
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > > This
[PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> > This adds core support for saving and restoring CPU PMU registers for
> > suspend/resume support i.e. deeper C-states in cp
; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save/restore pmu registers in pm notifier
Hi Neil,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
This adds core support for saving and restoring CPU PMU registers for
suspend/resume support i.e. deeper C
-Original Message-
From: Will Deacon [mailto:will.dea...@arm.com]
Sent: 2014年4月22日 18:37
To: Neil Zhang
Cc: li...@arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sudeep Holla; devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: perf: save
Hi Neil,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
> This adds core support for saving and restoring CPU PMU registers
> for suspend/resume support i.e. deeper C-states in cpuidle terms.
> This patch adds support only to ARMv7 PMU registers save/restore.
> It needs to be
Hi Neil,
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 03:26:36AM +0100, Neil Zhang wrote:
This adds core support for saving and restoring CPU PMU registers
for suspend/resume support i.e. deeper C-states in cpuidle terms.
This patch adds support only to ARMv7 PMU registers save/restore.
It needs to be extended to
38 matches
Mail list logo
