On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:l...@amacapital.net]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:41 AM
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Dear communities,
>> >
>> > I agree
> -Original Message-
> From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:l...@amacapital.net]
> Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:41 AM
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear communities,
> >
> > I agree with James. Due to different people may have different needs.
> >
-Original Message-
From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:l...@amacapital.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:41 AM
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
hock.leong.k...@intel.com wrote:
Dear communities,
I agree with James. Due to different people may have different
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:17 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
hock.leong.k...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andy Lutomirski [mailto:l...@amacapital.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 2:41 AM
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
hock.leong.k...@intel.com wrote:
Dear
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:39 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:36 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
>> >> I agree with James. Due to different people may
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:36 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> >> I agree with James. Due to different people may have different needs. But
> >> from our side, we would just
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> If it works (and cat really does fail reliably), then it seems okay to me.
>
> However, since I like pulling increasing numbers of my hats, someone
> should verify that the common embedded cat implementations are also
> okay with this.
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
>> I agree with James. Due to different people may have different needs. But
>> from our side, we would just like to have a simple interface for us to upload
>> the efi capsule and
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> I agree with James. Due to different people may have different needs. But
> from our side, we would just like to have a simple interface for us to upload
> the efi capsule and perform update. We do not have any use case or need
> to get
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 6:52 AM
>>
>> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:35
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 6:52 AM
>
> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, James Bottomley
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 6:52 AM
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 4:23 AM, Kweh, Hock Leong
hock.leong.k...@intel.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 6:52 AM
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27,
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
If it works (and cat really does fail reliably), then it seems okay to me.
However, since I like pulling increasing numbers of my hats, someone
should verify that the common embedded cat implementations are also
okay with this. For
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:36 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
I agree with James. Due to different people may have different needs. But
from
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
I agree with James. Due to different people may have different needs. But
from our side, we would just like to have a simple interface for us to upload
the efi capsule and perform update. We do not have any use case or need
to get info
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
I agree with James. Due to different people may have different needs. But
from our side, we would just like to have a simple interface for us
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:39 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 14:36 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-29 at 11:23 +, Kweh, Hock
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:59 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:59 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
>> >> > -Original Message-
>> >> > From: James
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:59 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> >> > -Original Message-
> >> > From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> >> >
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
>> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:10 PM
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2015-04-23
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:10 PM
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 15:40 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:59 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:59 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:35 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Mon, 2015-04-27 at 14:59 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 8:16 AM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:10 PM
> >
> > On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:30 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > > -Original
On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 02:14 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:10 PM
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:30 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:10 PM
>
> On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:30 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: James Bottomley
>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:14:18AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > OK, so this is what I'm trying to understand. Why isn't a pipe to
> > > firmware for something a "platform resource"? I think UEFI is in the
> > > same class as ACPI which uses platform devices all over.
> >
> > And I hate
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 11:50 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:11:17AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 17:46 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-04-15 at
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:30 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:19 PM
> >
> >
> > Yes, I think we've all agreed we can do it ... it's now a question of
> >
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:11:17AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 17:46 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at
> -Original Message-
> From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:19 PM
>
>
> Yes, I think we've all agreed we can do it ... it's now a question of whether
> we
> can stomach the ick factor of actually initiating a
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 11:50 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:11:17AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 17:46 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200,
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 09:14:18AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
OK, so this is what I'm trying to understand. Why isn't a pipe to
firmware for something a platform resource? I think UEFI is in the
same class as ACPI which uses platform devices all over.
And I hate the fact that
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:30 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:19 PM
Yes, I think we've all agreed we can do it ... it's now a question of
whether we
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2015 11:19 PM
Yes, I think we've all agreed we can do it ... it's now a question of whether
we
can stomach the ick factor of actually initiating a transaction in
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 09:11:17AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 17:46 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley [mailto:james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2015 10:10 PM
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 08:30 +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: James Bottomley
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:34 AM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 09:50 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Apr 21, 2015 9:51 PM, "James Bottomley"
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 09:50 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Apr 21, 2015 9:51 PM, "James Bottomley"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy
On Apr 21, 2015 9:51 PM, "James Bottomley"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 17:46 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > > > -Original
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:09 PM
> > >
> > > On Tue, Apr
> Yes, I think we've all agreed we can do it ... it's now a question of
> whether we can stomach the ick factor of actually initiating a
> transaction in close ... I'm still feeling queasy.
NFS does transactions - including figuring out if the data will fit - on
file close. It does that for real
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 09:27 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:58:58PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
> > wrote:
> > > Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
> > > update from close()? In
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:58:58PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
> > update from close()? In theory close returns an error code (not sure if
> > most tools
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 17:46 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
On Apr 21, 2015 9:51 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:09 PM
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:58:58PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
update from close()? In theory close returns an error code
Yes, I think we've all agreed we can do it ... it's now a question of
whether we can stomach the ick factor of actually initiating a
transaction in close ... I'm still feeling queasy.
NFS does transactions - including figuring out if the data will fit - on
file close. It does that for real
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:35:54AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-15 at 15:19 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 09:27 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 06:58:58PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 09:50 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Apr 21, 2015 9:51 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 10:34 AM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 09:50 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Apr 21, 2015 9:51 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
> >> wrote:
> >> > Andy, just on the misc device idea, what
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
>> wrote:
>> > Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
>> > update from close()? In theory close
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
> > update from close()? In theory close returns an error code (not sure if
> > most tools actually
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
> update from close()? In theory close returns an error code (not sure if
> most tools actually check this, though). That means we can do the write
> in chunks but
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 09:56 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:23:55AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:43 PM
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:23:55AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:43 PM
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 03:28:32AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > Regarding the
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:23:55AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:43 PM
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 03:28:32AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
Regarding the 'reboot
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 09:56 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:23:55AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:43 PM
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
update from close()? In theory close returns an error code (not sure if
most tools actually check this, though). That means we
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about triggering the capsule
update from close()? In theory close returns an error code (not sure
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
Andy, just on the misc device idea, what about
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 20:24 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 7:20 PM, James Bottomley
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com wrote:
On Tue, 2015-04-21 at 18:58 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 6:21 PM, James Bottomley
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:43 PM
>
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 03:28:32AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > Regarding the 'reboot require' status, is it critical to have a 1 to 1
> > status
> match
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:49 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:42:31AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:19 PM
> > >
> > > On Wed,
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 03:28:32AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> Regarding the 'reboot require' status, is it critical to have a 1 to 1 status
> match
> with the capsule upload binary? Is it okay to have one sysfs file note to
> tell the
> overall status (for example: 10 capsule binaries
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 10:43 PM
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 03:28:32AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
Regarding the 'reboot require' status, is it critical to have a 1 to 1
status
match
with the
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 03:28:32AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
Regarding the 'reboot require' status, is it critical to have a 1 to 1 status
match
with the capsule upload binary? Is it okay to have one sysfs file note to
tell the
overall status (for example: 10 capsule binaries uploaded
On Fri, 2015-04-17 at 15:49 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:42:31AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:19 PM
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Fleming [mailto:m...@codeblueprint.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 10:37 PM
>
> On Fri, 17 Apr, at 03:49:24PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Not really, the kernel namespace is what matters at that point in time.
> >
> > And maybe it does matter, I haven't
-Original Message-
From: Matt Fleming [mailto:m...@codeblueprint.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 10:37 PM
On Fri, 17 Apr, at 03:49:24PM, Greg KH wrote:
Not really, the kernel namespace is what matters at that point in time.
And maybe it does matter, I haven't thought
On Fri, 17 Apr, at 03:49:24PM, Greg KH wrote:
>
> Not really, the kernel namespace is what matters at that point in time.
>
> And maybe it does matter, I haven't thought through all of the issues.
> But passing a path from userspace, to the kernel, to have the kernel
> turn around again and use
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 05:19:09PM -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Apr 15, 2015 6:20 AM, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:42:31AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:19 PM
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, 17 Apr, at 03:49:24PM, Greg KH wrote:
Not really, the kernel namespace is what matters at that point in time.
And maybe it does matter, I haven't thought through all of the issues.
But passing a path from userspace, to the kernel, to have the kernel
turn around again and use that
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 05:19:09PM -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2015 6:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 09:42:31AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:19 PM
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:19 PM
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Wednesday, April 15, 2015 9:19 PM
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2015 6:20 AM, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM
On Apr 15, 2015 6:20 AM, "Greg Kroah-Hartman"
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > >> From: "Kweh, Hock Leong"
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> >> From: "Kweh, Hock Leong"
> >>
> >> Introducing a kernel module to expose capsule loader
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:09 PM
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > > From: "Kweh,
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:09 PM
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> > From: "Kweh, Hock Leong"
> >
> > Introducing a kernel module to expose capsule loader
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:32:29AM +, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:09 PM
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
From: Kweh, Hock Leong
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
From: Kweh, Hock Leong hock.leong.k...@intel.com
Introducing a kernel
On Apr 15, 2015 6:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Andy Lutomirski l...@amacapital.net wrote:
On Apr 15, 2015 6:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:52:48AM -0400, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
-Original Message-
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman [mailto:gre...@linuxfoundation.org]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 10:09 PM
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
From: Kweh, Hock Leong hock.leong.k...@intel.com
Introducing a kernel module to expose
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
>> From: "Kweh, Hock Leong"
>>
>> Introducing a kernel module to expose capsule loader interface
>> for user to upload capsule binaries. This module leverage the
>>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
> From: "Kweh, Hock Leong"
>
> Introducing a kernel module to expose capsule loader interface
> for user to upload capsule binaries. This module leverage the
> request_firmware_direct_full_path() to obtain the binary at a
>
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 10:09 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
From: Kweh, Hock Leong hock.leong.k...@intel.com
Introducing a kernel module to expose capsule loader interface
for user to upload capsule
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:44:56PM +0800, Kweh, Hock Leong wrote:
From: Kweh, Hock Leong hock.leong.k...@intel.com
Introducing a kernel module to expose capsule loader interface
for user to upload capsule binaries. This module leverage the
request_firmware_direct_full_path() to obtain the
100 matches
Mail list logo
