On Fri, August 30, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Seungwon,
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> >> I'd really still rather honor the MMC subsystem's request. It
> >> shouldn't _hurt_ to turn the clock off when the subsystem requests it,
> > Even though turning off by
Seungwon,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>> I'd really still rather honor the MMC subsystem's request. It
>> shouldn't _hurt_ to turn the clock off when the subsystem requests it,
> Even though turning off by clock programming doesn't hurt,
> it is costly behavior when
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Jaehoon / Seungwon,
>
> On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> > On 08/26/2013 01:34 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> >> On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >>> Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Jaehoon / Seungwon,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 01:34 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any
Seungwon,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
I'd really still rather honor the MMC subsystem's request. It
shouldn't _hurt_ to turn the clock off when the subsystem requests it,
Even though turning off by clock programming doesn't hurt,
it is costly
On Fri, August 30, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Seungwon,
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Seungwon Jeon tgih@samsung.com wrote:
I'd really still rather honor the MMC subsystem's request. It
shouldn't _hurt_ to turn the clock off when the subsystem requests it,
Even though turning
Jaehoon / Seungwon,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 01:34 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
>> On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>>> Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
>>> card's clock. This doesn't seem like a good
On 08/26/2013 01:34 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
> On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
>> card's clock. This doesn't seem like a good thing in general, but had
>> one extra bad side effect in the following situtation:
On 08/26/2013 01:34 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
card's clock. This doesn't seem like a good thing in general, but had
one extra bad side effect in the following situtation:
* mmc
Jaehoon / Seungwon,
On Mon, Aug 26, 2013 at 2:06 AM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
On 08/26/2013 01:34 PM, Seungwon Jeon wrote:
On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
card's clock. This doesn't seem
On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
> card's clock. This doesn't seem like a good thing in general, but had
> one extra bad side effect in the following situtation:
> * mmc core would set clk to 400kHz at boot time
Jaehoon,
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> On 08/24/2013 05:40 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
>> Jaehoon,
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung
>> wrote:
>>> Hi Doug,
>>>
>>> If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's continuously printed the
Hi Doug,
On 08/24/2013 05:40 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Jaehoon,
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's continuously printed the
>> kernel message for Bus_speed.
>
> Can you explain? I don't think dw_mmc has
Hi Doug,
On 08/24/2013 05:40 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Jaehoon,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's continuously printed the
kernel message for Bus_speed.
Can you explain? I don't think
Jaehoon,
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
On 08/24/2013 05:40 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Jaehoon,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com
wrote:
Hi Doug,
If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's
On Fri, August 23, 2013, Doug Anderson wrote:
Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
card's clock. This doesn't seem like a good thing in general, but had
one extra bad side effect in the following situtation:
* mmc core would set clk to 400kHz at boot time
Jaehoon,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's continuously printed the
> kernel message for Bus_speed.
Can you explain? I don't think dw_mmc has support for clock gating
right now. ...or are there some patches
Hi Doug,
If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's continuously printed the kernel
message for Bus_speed.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 08/23/2013 01:19 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
> card's clock. This doesn't seem
Hi Doug,
If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's continuously printed the kernel
message for Bus_speed.
Best Regards,
Jaehoon Chung
On 08/23/2013 01:19 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Previously the dw_mmc driver would ignore any requests to disable the
card's clock. This doesn't seem like
Jaehoon,
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Jaehoon Chung jh80.ch...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Doug,
If the clock-gating is enabled, then maybe it's continuously printed the
kernel message for Bus_speed.
Can you explain? I don't think dw_mmc has support for clock gating
right now. ...or are
20 matches
Mail list logo
