On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
>> On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>>>
Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct
siginfo, this patch syncs it with general version to
On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct
siginfo, this patch syncs it with general version to avoid build issue.
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
> On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> >
> >> Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct siginfo,
> >> this patch syncs it with general version to avoid build issue.
> >
> > You completely fail
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Ren, Qiaowei wrote:
On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct siginfo,
this patch syncs it with general version to avoid build issue.
You completely fail to explain
On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>
>> Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct siginfo,
>> this patch syncs it with general version to avoid build issue.
>
> You completely fail to explain which build issue is addressed by this
>
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct siginfo,
> this patch syncs it with general version to avoid build issue.
You completely fail to explain which build issue is addressed by this
patch. The code you added to kernel/signal.c which
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct siginfo,
this patch syncs it with general version to avoid build issue.
You completely fail to explain which build issue is addressed by this
patch. The code you added to kernel/signal.c which
On 2014-09-12, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
Due to new fields about bound violation added into struct siginfo,
this patch syncs it with general version to avoid build issue.
You completely fail to explain which build issue is addressed by this
patch.
8 matches
Mail list logo