> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:17:09AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
> > >
> > > You simply don't need the avai
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:17:09AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
> >
> > You simply don't need the available field. You don't need to track
> > whether they are available. If a user enables a pwm whi
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:17:09AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
You simply don't need the available field. You don't need to track
whether they are available. If a user enables a pwm which is not routed
out of the SoC
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 04:17:09AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
You simply don't need the available field. You don't need to track
whether
> Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
>
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:33:37AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
> >
> > > > +static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
> > > > +*pwm) {
&
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:33:37AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
>
> > > +static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
> > > +*pwm) {
> > > + struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
> > > + struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
> > > +
> > > + fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
> > > +
> > > + pwm_data =
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:33:37AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
+static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
+*pwm) {
+ struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
+ struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
+
+ fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
+
+ pwm_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] pwm: Add Freescale FTM PWM driver support
On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 03:33:37AM +, Xiubo Li-B47053 wrote:
+static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
+*pwm) {
+ struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
+ struct fsl_pwm_data
> > +static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
> > +*pwm) {
> > + struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
> > + struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
> > +
> > + fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
> > +
> > + pwm_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
> > + if (!pwm_data)
> > + return;
>
>
+static void fsl_pwm_free(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
+*pwm) {
+ struct fsl_pwm_chip *fpc;
+ struct fsl_pwm_data *pwm_data;
+
+ fpc = to_fsl_chip(chip);
+
+ pwm_data = pwm_get_chip_data(pwm);
+ if (!pwm_data)
+ return;
THis check seems
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:48:49PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> +
> +#define FTM_CSC_BASE0x0C
> +#define FTM_CSC(_channel) \
> + (FTM_CSC_BASE + ((_channel) * 8))
Put into a single line.
> +#define FTMCnSC_MSB BIT(5)
> +#define FTMCnSC_MSA BIT(4)
> +#define FTMCnSC_ELSB
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 05:48:49PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
+
+#define FTM_CSC_BASE0x0C
+#define FTM_CSC(_channel) \
+ (FTM_CSC_BASE + ((_channel) * 8))
Put into a single line.
+#define FTMCnSC_MSB BIT(5)
+#define FTMCnSC_MSA BIT(4)
+#define FTMCnSC_ELSB
12 matches
Mail list logo
