inux...@openeuler.org; h...@zytor.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler level for x86
>
>
>
> On 3/23/21 4:21 PM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>
> >>
> >> On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> >>> From: Tim
On 3/23/21 4:21 PM, Song Bao Hua (Barry Song) wrote:
>>
>> On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
>>> From: Tim Chen
>>>
>>> There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
>>> is shared among a cluster of cores instead of being exclusive
>>> to one single core.
>>>
>>> To
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org;
> > xuwei (O) ; Zengtao (B) ;
> > guodong...@linaro.org; yangyicong ; Liguozhu
> (Kenneth)
> > ; linux...@openeuler.org; h...@zytor.com
> > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster sched
inux...@openeuler.org; h...@zytor.com
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 4/4] scheduler: Add cluster scheduler level for x86
>
>
>
> On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> > From: Tim Chen
> >
> > There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
>
On 3/18/21 9:16 PM, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Tim Chen
>
> There are x86 CPU architectures (e.g. Jacobsville) where L2 cahce
> is shared among a cluster of cores instead of being exclusive
> to one single core.
>
> To prevent oversubscription of L2 cache, load should be
> balanced between
5 matches
Mail list logo