RE: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-04 Thread Zheng, Lv
Hi, Benjamin > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com] > Subject: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI > > Hi, > > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly works as > expected (still not fully compliant yet). > >

RE: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-04 Thread Zheng, Lv
Hi, Benjamin > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com] > Subject: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI > > Hi, > > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly works as > expected (still not fully compliant yet). > >

Re: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-02 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Jun 01 2017 or thereabouts, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 20:46 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly > > works as > > expected (still not fully compliant yet). > > > > So this is based on Lennart's

Re: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-02 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Jun 01 2017 or thereabouts, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 20:46 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly > > works as > > expected (still not fully compliant yet). > > > > So this is based on Lennart's

Re: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 20:46 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > Hi, > > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly > works as > expected (still not fully compliant yet). > > So this is based on Lennart's comment in [1]: if the LID state is not > reliable, > the kernel

Re: [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch exported by ACPI

2017-06-01 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2017-06-01 at 20:46 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > Hi, > > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly > works as > expected (still not fully compliant yet). > > So this is based on Lennart's comment in [1]: if the LID state is not > reliable, > the kernel