Hi,
> From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 02:45 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:
Hi,
> From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 02:45 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > > From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 02:45 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable
> > LID switch exported by ACPI
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-0
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 02:45 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable
> > LID switch exported by ACPI
> >
> > On Mon, 2017-0
Hi,
> From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 01:43 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > If you implement it i
Hi,
> From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 01:43 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > If you implement it i
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 01:43 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
>
> >
> > If you implement it in such a way that GNOME settings daemon
> > behaves weirdly, you'll get my revert
> > request in the mail. Do. Not. Ever. Lie.
>
> First, I don't know what should be reverted...
> I have 2 solutions here for
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 01:43 +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
>
> >
> > If you implement it in such a way that GNOME settings daemon
> > behaves weirdly, you'll get my revert
> > request in the mail. Do. Not. Ever. Lie.
>
> First, I don't know what should be reverted...
> I have 2 solutions here for
Hi, Lennart
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:mzxre...@0pointer.de]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Fri, 16.06.17 11:06, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote:
>
> > > Let's consider this c
Hi, Lennart
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:mzxre...@0pointer.de]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Fri, 16.06.17 11:06, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote:
>
> > > Let's consider this c
Hi,
> From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
>
>
> > On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:53, Zheng, Lv <lv.zh...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
>
Hi,
> From: Bastien Nocera [mailto:had...@hadess.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
>
>
> > On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:53, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >> From: Benja
On Fri, 16.06.17 11:06, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote:
> > Let's consider this case with delay:
> > After resume, gnome-setting-daemon queries SW_LID and got "close".
> > Then it lights up the wrong monitors.
> > Then I believe "open" will be delivered to it several seconds later.
> >
On Fri, 16.06.17 11:06, Bastien Nocera (had...@hadess.net) wrote:
> > Let's consider this case with delay:
> > After resume, gnome-setting-daemon queries SW_LID and got "close".
> > Then it lights up the wrong monitors.
> > Then I believe "open" will be delivered to it several seconds later.
> >
> On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:53, Zheng, Lv <lv.zh...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
>> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
>> switch exported by ACPI
>>
&g
> On 16 Jun 2017, at 10:53, Zheng, Lv wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
>> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
>> switch exported by ACPI
>>
>>> On Jun 16
Hi,
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi, Benjamin
> >
> > Let me
Hi,
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi, Benjamin
> >
> > Let me
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Benjamin
>
> Let me just say something one more time.
>
> > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
[snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > We can see:
> > > > > "logind" has already implemented a timeout, and will not respond lid
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Benjamin
>
> Let me just say something one more time.
>
> > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
[snip]
> > > > >
> > > > > We can see:
> > > > > "logind" has already implemented a timeout, and will not respond lid
Hi, Benjamin
Let me just say something one more time.
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> &g
Hi, Benjamin
Let me just say something one more time.
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> &g
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> > Hutterer
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
> > swi
On Jun 16 2017 or thereabouts, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> > [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> > Hutterer
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
> > swi
Hi,
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> Hutterer
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:33:58AM +, Zheng, Lv
Hi,
> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Peter
> Hutterer
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:33:58AM +, Zheng, Lv
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:33:58AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Peter
>
> > From: Peter Hutterer [mailto:peter.hutte...@who-t.net]
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
> > switch exported by ACPI
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 15,
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 07:33:58AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Peter
>
> > From: Peter Hutterer [mailto:peter.hutte...@who-t.net]
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
> > switch exported by ACPI
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 15,
Hi, Peter
> From: Peter Hutterer [mailto:peter.hutte...@who-t.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:57AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi, Benjamin
> >
>
Hi, Peter
> From: Peter Hutterer [mailto:peter.hutte...@who-t.net]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:57AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi, Benjamin
> >
>
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:57AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Benjamin
>
> > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
> > switch exported by ACPI
> >
> >
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 02:52:57AM +, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> Hi, Benjamin
>
> > From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID
> > switch exported by ACPI
> >
> >
Hi, Benjamin
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> Hi,
>
> [Sorry for the delay, I have been sidetracked from this]
>
> On Jun 07 2
Hi, Benjamin
> From: Benjamin Tissoires [mailto:benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> Hi,
>
> [Sorry for the delay, I have been sidetracked from this]
>
> On Jun 07 2
Hi,
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:mzxre...@0pointer.de]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Thu, 01.06.17 20:46, Benjamin Tissoires (benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
&g
Hi,
> From: Lennart Poettering [mailto:mzxre...@0pointer.de]
> Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [WIP PATCH 0/4] Rework the unreliable LID switch
> exported by ACPI
>
> On Thu, 01.06.17 20:46, Benjamin Tissoires (benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
&g
Hi,
[Sorry for the delay, I have been sidetracked from this]
On Jun 07 2017 or thereabouts, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 01.06.17 20:46, Benjamin Tissoires (benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly
Hi,
[Sorry for the delay, I have been sidetracked from this]
On Jun 07 2017 or thereabouts, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 01.06.17 20:46, Benjamin Tissoires (benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com)
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly
On Thu, 01.06.17 20:46, Benjamin Tissoires (benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly works as
> expected (still not fully compliant yet).
>
> So this is based on Lennart's comment in [1]: if the LID state is not
>
On Thu, 01.06.17 20:46, Benjamin Tissoires (benjamin.tissoi...@redhat.com)
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sending this as a WIP as it still need a few changes, but it mostly works as
> expected (still not fully compliant yet).
>
> So this is based on Lennart's comment in [1]: if the LID state is not
>
40 matches
Mail list logo
