Re: ATA failure regression

2016-09-29 Thread t...@kernel.org
Hello, (cc'ing Dan, hi!) On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 08:25:58AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > Actually, according to Shah's post from the 26th to this thread, > everything works just fine even with the IOMMU enabled, as long as the > system is configured to NOT auto-shutdown unused SATA

Re: ATA failure regression

2016-09-29 Thread Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
On Thu, 29 Sep 2016, t...@kernel.org wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:45:08AM +, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > > Can someone please help me to debug this issue? > > The only thing I can do from libata side is disbling msi on the > affected platform, but the problem doesn't seem confined

Re: ATA failure regression

2016-09-29 Thread t...@kernel.org
Hello, On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 05:45:08AM +, Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra wrote: > Can someone please help me to debug this issue? The only thing I can do from libata side is disbling msi on the affected platform, but the problem doesn't seem confined to ahci, so probably the right thing to do fo

RE: ATA failure regression

2016-09-27 Thread Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra
org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: ATA failure regression Hi Bharat Thanks for the reply. I have observed following thing If IOMMU is enabled in BIOS and I use following option FCH SATA Debug Options --> Unused SATA Port Auto Shut Down Disabled. Issue is not

RE: ATA failure regression

2016-09-23 Thread Bharat Kumar Gogada
> Hi All, > > Resending this wider audience > > Currently I am working on AMD future platform. I am hitting the same bug of > ATA Failure Regression reported in past. > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6875661/) or > http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1507.3/01961.html > > I am newbie

RE: ATA failure regression

2016-09-23 Thread Shah, Nehal-bakulchandra
Hi All, Resending this wider audience Currently I am working on AMD future platform. I am hitting the same bug of ATA Failure Regression reported in past. (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6875661/) or http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1507.3/01961.html I am newbie to this and beca

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-31 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 31.07.2015 um 12:42 schrieb Jiang Liu: On 2015/7/31 18:38, Alexander Holler wrote: Am 28.07.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Alexander Holler: Same problem here with the AMD SATA controller (1022:7801). It failed to identify the second disk when using 4.2-rc4. nointremap helped, nothing else tested

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-31 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/7/31 18:38, Alexander Holler wrote: > Am 28.07.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Alexander Holler: > >> Same problem here with the AMD SATA controller (1022:7801). It failed to >> identify the second disk when using 4.2-rc4. >> >> nointremap helped, nothing else tested > > A quick look at the chang

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-31 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 28.07.2015 um 20:37 schrieb Alexander Holler: Same problem here with the AMD SATA controller (1022:7801). It failed to identify the second disk when using 4.2-rc4. nointremap helped, nothing else tested A quick look at the change history and two tests are suggesting that the right one alr

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-28 Thread Alexander Holler
Am 28.07.2015 um 20:19 schrieb Alex Deucher: On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jiang Liu wrote: On 2015/7/27 23:21, Alex Deucher wrote: On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jiang Liu wrote: On 2015/7/25 1:38, Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, Ju

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-28 Thread Alex Deucher
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jiang Liu wrote: > On 2015/7/27 23:21, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jiang Liu >> wrote: >>> On 2015/7/25 1:38, Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM,

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-27 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/7/27 23:21, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Jiang Liu wrote: >> On 2015/7/25 1:38, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-26 Thread Jiang Liu
On 2015/7/25 1:38, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: Something new in kernel 4.2 seems to have broken one of my hard

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-24 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Hello, >> >> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >>> Something new in kernel 4.2 seems to have broken one of my hard drives >>> (ssd) in kernel 4.2. 4.1 and older

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-23 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: >> Something new in kernel 4.2 seems to have broken one of my hard drives >> (ssd) in kernel 4.2. 4.1 and older kernels work fine. Here are the >> relevant logs. >> > ...

Re: ATA failure regression in kernel 4.2

2015-07-23 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 01:48:24PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > Something new in kernel 4.2 seems to have broken one of my hard drives > (ssd) in kernel 4.2. 4.1 and older kernels work fine. Here are the > relevant logs. > ... > [6.547628] ata2.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) > [6.5477