On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y
> > >
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y
> > >
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
> > work:
> >
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:11:43AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> > I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
> > work:
> >
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> > Subject: [PATCH] mm:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y && CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
> work:
>
> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> Subject: [PATCH] mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no
> pages were isolated
Hi,
On Monday 08 October 2012 10:48:07 Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:06:54PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > Hi Mel,
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 02,
Hi,
On Monday 08 October 2012 10:48:07 Mel Gorman wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:06:54PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
work:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH] mm: compaction: cache if a pageblock was scanned and no
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 11:11:43AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
work:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com
Subject:
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y CONFIG_COMPACTION=y case
work:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz b.zolnier...@samsung.com
Subject: [PATCH]
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y CONFIG_COMPACTION=y
case
work:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 01:08:30PM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
On Tuesday 09 October 2012 12:11:43 Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 10:40:10AM +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
I also need following patch to make CONFIG_CMA=y CONFIG_COMPACTION=y
case
work:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:06:54PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Mel,
>
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > > So this really
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
So this really isn't all that
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:06:54PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi Mel,
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 04:12:17PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
> > > > results from last
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
> > > results from last week. We'll see if bisection shows up something
> > > interesting.
> >
> >
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
> > results from last week. We'll see if bisection shows up something
> > interesting.
>
> I just finished bisecting this and git reports:
>
>
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:24:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:43:32PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at
On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 04:24:29PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:43:32PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
results from last week. We'll see if bisection shows up something
interesting.
I just finished bisecting this and git reports:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
results from last week. We'll see if bisection shows up something
interesting.
I just
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 05:03:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:41:35PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 02:48:14PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
So this really isn't all that new, but I just wanted to confirm my
results from last week. We'll
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> >
> > I've been running a few tests and indeed this solves the obvious problem
> > that the coherent pool cannot be created at boot (which in turn caused
> > the ethernet adapter to fail on Tegra).
> >
> > However I've been
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > >> I hope this patch fixes the
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > >> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
> > >> but has some problem about
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> >> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
> >> but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
> >> feel free to modify and resend to
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
>> but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
>> feel free to modify and resend to akpm, Please.
>>
>
> A full revert is overkill. Can the following patch be
> I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
> but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
> feel free to modify and resend to akpm, Please.
>
A full revert is overkill. Can the following patch be tested as a
potential replacement please?
---8<---
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:56:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> > > Thierry Reding wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Marek,
> > > >
> >
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> > Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marek,
> > >
> > > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> >
On 09/28/2012 08:43 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> From 24a547855fa2bd4212a779cc73997837148310b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim
> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:28:32 +0900
> Subject: [PATCH] revert mm: compaction: iron out isolate_freepages_block()
> and isolate_freepages_range()
>
> [1]
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> > Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marek,
> > >
> > > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> >
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi Marek,
any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see
On 09/28/2012 08:43 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
From 24a547855fa2bd4212a779cc73997837148310b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim minc...@kernel.org
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:28:32 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] revert mm: compaction: iron out isolate_freepages_block()
and
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi Marek,
any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 08:56:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 02:43:30PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi
I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
feel free to modify and resend to akpm, Please.
A full revert is overkill. Can the following patch be tested as a
potential replacement please?
---8---
mm:
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
feel free to modify and resend to akpm, Please.
A full revert is overkill. Can the following patch be tested as
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
but has some problem about description or someone has better idea,
feel free to modify and resend to akpm,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch fixes the problem
but has some problem about description or someone
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
I hope this patch fixes the bug. If this patch
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Hi,
On 09/28/2012 11:37 AM,
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
I've been running a few tests and indeed this solves the obvious problem
that the coherent pool cannot be created at boot (which in turn caused
the ethernet adapter to fail on Tegra).
However I've been working on the
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:48:25AM
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 11:27:28AM
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 01:39:24PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:07:12PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:51:13PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:38:15PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 28, 2012 at 12:32:07PM
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
> Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > Hi Marek,
> >
> > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> > haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> >
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
> able
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:29 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
> > any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> > haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> > bit of
Hello,
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:29 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
> any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
> haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
> bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
> able to
Hello,
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:29 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
bit of restructuring of various memory allocation bits lately. I wasn't
able to
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:59:19PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
On Thursday, September 27, 2012 1:29 PM Thierry Reding wrote:
any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
bit of restructuring of
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi Marek,
any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but there's been quite a
bit of restructuring of various memory allocation
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 03:11:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2012 13:29:11 +0200
Thierry Reding thierry.red...@avionic-design.de wrote:
Hi Marek,
any idea why CMA might be broken in next-20120926. I see that there
haven't been any major changes to CMA itself, but
60 matches
Mail list logo