RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm tree related)

2013-09-02 Thread Deucher, Alexander
> -Original Message- > From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au] > Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 5:01 AM > To: Dave Airlie > Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Deucher, > Alexander > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final

RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm tree related)

2013-09-02 Thread Deucher, Alexander
-Original Message- From: Stephen Rothwell [mailto:s...@canb.auug.org.au] Sent: Monday, September 02, 2013 5:01 AM To: Dave Airlie Cc: linux-n...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Deucher, Alexander Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm tree related)

2013-02-21 Thread Rob Clark
Hmm, maybe DRM_GEM_CMA_HELPER should depend on ARM (or !PPC)? Or maybe there is an alternative fxn to use on other archs? In truth, it is fine to make TILCDC depend on ARM, as it wouldn't be used on any other platform (today.. until TI comes up with some crazy chip w/ some TI DSP plus display

Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree (drm tree related)

2013-02-21 Thread Rob Clark
Hmm, maybe DRM_GEM_CMA_HELPER should depend on ARM (or !PPC)? Or maybe there is an alternative fxn to use on other archs? In truth, it is fine to make TILCDC depend on ARM, as it wouldn't be used on any other platform (today.. until TI comes up with some crazy chip w/ some TI DSP plus display