On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 13:50 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
> it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
> seem to come back into a usable state.
>
> If anyone wants to work on getting this port back
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
> it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
> seem to come back into a usable state.
>
> If anyone wants to work on getting this port back into a usable
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:10:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
> > it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
> > seem to come
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
> it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
> seem to come back into a usable state.
>
> If anyone wants to work on getting this
Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
seem to come back into a usable state.
If anyone wants to work on getting this port back into a usable state in
the forseeable future he should speak up
Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
seem to come back into a usable state.
If anyone wants to work on getting this port back into a usable state in
the forseeable future he should speak up
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
seem to come back into a usable state.
If anyone wants to work on getting this port
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:10:12PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2007 at 01:50:40PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
seem to come back
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
seem to come back into a usable state.
If anyone wants to work on getting this port back into a usable
On Sun, 2007-07-29 at 13:50 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Considering the state of the arm26 port, I do hereby suggest to remove
it from the Linx kernel since it's far from a usable state and doesn't
seem to come back into a usable state.
If anyone wants to work on getting this port back into
10 matches
Mail list logo
