Michael Tokarev wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
[]
RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1.
It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically -
does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's
just a bit more efficient (less levels, more room for
Michael Tokarev wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
[]
RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1.
It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically -
does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's
just a bit more efficient (less levels, more room for
On Jan 28 2007 22:44, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>>> Mdadm creates those nodes automa[tg]ically - man mdadm, search for --auto.
>>
>> Note that `mdadm -As` _is_ run on FC6 boot.
>
>See above -- man mdadm, search for --auto. -A = --assemble, -s = --scan.
Oops, thank you. So
mdadm -A -s
On Jan 28 2007 22:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>Bill Davidsen wrote:
>[]
>> RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1.
>
>It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically -
>does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's
>just a bit more efficient (less
Bill Davidsen wrote:
[]
> RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1.
It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically -
does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's
just a bit more efficient (less levels, more room for optimisations),
easy to use
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 28 2007 12:05, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
>> Mdadm creates those nodes automa[tg]ically - man mdadm, search for --auto.
>
> Note that `mdadm -As` _is_ run on FC6 boot.
See above -- man mdadm, search for --auto. -A = --assemble, -s = --scan.
>> In order for an md
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets my
raid setup.
Created 2 raid 1 arrays in md0 and md1 and that works
and survives a reboot.
However - I created a raid 0 on /dev/md2 made up of
/dev/md0 and /dev/md1 and it
On Jan 28 2007 12:05, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>
>> That's interesting. I am using Aurora Corona, and all but md0 vanishes.
>> (Reason for that is that udev does not create the nodes md1-md31 on
>> boot, so mdadm cannot assemble the arrays.)
>
>This is nonsense.
>
>Mdadm
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Jan 27 2007 10:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
[]
>> Sorry about that. I'm using Fedora Core 6. /dev/md0
>> and /dev/md1, buth of which are raid 1 arrays survive
>> the reboot. But when I make a raid 0 out of those two
>> raid arrays that's what is vanishing.
>
> That's
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jan 27 2007 10:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
[]
Sorry about that. I'm using Fedora Core 6. /dev/md0
and /dev/md1, buth of which are raid 1 arrays survive
the reboot. But when I make a raid 0 out of those two
raid arrays that's what is vanishing.
That's interesting. I am
On Jan 28 2007 12:05, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
That's interesting. I am using Aurora Corona, and all but md0 vanishes.
(Reason for that is that udev does not create the nodes md1-md31 on
boot, so mdadm cannot assemble the arrays.)
This is nonsense.
Mdadm creates those
Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets my
raid setup.
Created 2 raid 1 arrays in md0 and md1 and that works
and survives a reboot.
However - I created a raid 0 on /dev/md2 made up of
/dev/md0 and /dev/md1 and it
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Jan 28 2007 12:05, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
Mdadm creates those nodes automa[tg]ically - man mdadm, search for --auto.
Note that `mdadm -As` _is_ run on FC6 boot.
See above -- man mdadm, search for --auto. -A = --assemble, -s = --scan.
In order for an md array to
Bill Davidsen wrote:
[]
RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1.
It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically -
does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's
just a bit more efficient (less levels, more room for optimisations),
easy to use (you'll
On Jan 28 2007 22:49, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Bill Davidsen wrote:
[]
RAID-10 is not the same as RAID 0+1.
It is. Yes, there's separate module for raid10, but what it - basically -
does is the same as raid0 module over two raid1 modules will do. It's
just a bit more efficient (less levels,
On Jan 28 2007 22:44, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Mdadm creates those nodes automa[tg]ically - man mdadm, search for --auto.
Note that `mdadm -As` _is_ run on FC6 boot.
See above -- man mdadm, search for --auto. -A = --assemble, -s = --scan.
Oops, thank you. So
mdadm -A -s --auto=yes
On Jan 27 2007 10:42, Marc Perkel wrote:
>> >
>> >I'm using Fedora Core 6. /dev/md0 and /dev/md1, buth of which are raid
>> >1 arrays survive the reboot. But when I make a raid 0 out of those two
>> >raid arrays that's what is vanishing.
>>
>> That's interesting. I am using Aurora Corona
Also - when running software raid 10 - what's a good
chunck size these days? Running raid 10 with 4 500 GB
SATA2 drives with 16mb buffers?
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000
--- Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jan 27 2007 10:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
> >--- Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I
> >> set
> >> >it up and it worked but after a reboot it
> forgets
> >> my
> >> >raid setup.
>
On Jan 27 2007 10:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
>--- Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I
>> set
>> >it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets
>> my
>> >raid setup.
>>
>> Now, let's hear the name of the distribution you
>> use.
>>
--- Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I
> set
> >it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets
> my
> >raid setup.
>
> Now, let's hear the name of the distribution you
> use.
>
> BTW, is md1 also disappearing?
>
Sorry about
>I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I set
>it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets my
>raid setup.
Now, let's hear the name of the distribution you use.
BTW, is md1 also disappearing?
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets my
raid setup.
Created 2 raid 1 arrays in md0 and md1 and that works
and survives a reboot.
However - I created a raid 0 on /dev/md2 made up of
/dev/md0 and /dev/md1 and it worked but it
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets my
raid setup.
Created 2 raid 1 arrays in md0 and md1 and that works
and survives a reboot.
However - I created a raid 0 on /dev/md2 made up of
/dev/md0 and /dev/md1 and it worked but it
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets my
raid setup.
Now, let's hear the name of the distribution you use.
BTW, is md1 also disappearing?
-`J'
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel
--- Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I
set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets
my
raid setup.
Now, let's hear the name of the distribution you
use.
BTW, is md1 also disappearing?
Sorry about that. I'm using
On Jan 27 2007 10:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
--- Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I
set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it forgets
my
raid setup.
Now, let's hear the name of the distribution you
use.
BTW, is md1 also
--- Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 27 2007 10:31, Marc Perkel wrote:
--- Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a little stumped trying to set up raid 10. I
set
it up and it worked but after a reboot it
forgets
my
raid setup.
Now, let's hear the name
Also - when running software raid 10 - what's a good
chunck size these days? Running raid 10 with 4 500 GB
SATA2 drives with 16mb buffers?
Now that's room service! Choose from over 150,000 hotels
in 45,000
On Jan 27 2007 10:42, Marc Perkel wrote:
I'm using Fedora Core 6. /dev/md0 and /dev/md1, buth of which are raid
1 arrays survive the reboot. But when I make a raid 0 out of those two
raid arrays that's what is vanishing.
That's interesting. I am using Aurora Corona [FC6+RHide], and all
30 matches
Mail list logo
