(other lists -> bcc)
Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Jeff King writes:
>> Is it worth mentioning here the reversion of v2 as the default protocol?
>>
>> It does end up (along with the actual code fix) in the "fixes from
>> v2.26" section:
>>
>>> * Those fetching over protocol v2 from linux-next and
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 01:31:30PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> The promotion in Git 2.26 was buried in the "performance &
> implementation details" section and not in the backward
> compatibility section, so it feels a bit funny to highlight the
> reversion. In any case, here is what I
Hi folks,
> Shourya Shukla (4):
> submodule--helper.c: Rename 'cb_foreach' to 'foreach_cb'
> gitfaq: files in .gitignore are tracked
> gitfaq: fetching and pulling a repository
> submodule: port subcommand 'set-url' from shell to C
Could you please review the minor fix in
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:17:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Git 2.27 Release Notes (draft)
>> ==
>>
>> Updates since v2.26
>> ---
>>
>> Backward compatibility notes
>
> Is it worth mentioning here the reversion of v2 as
Jeff King writes:
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:17:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Git 2.27 Release Notes (draft)
>> ==
>>
>> Updates since v2.26
>> ---
>>
>> Backward compatibility notes
>
> Is it worth mentioning here the reversion of v2 as
On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 12:17:11PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Git 2.27 Release Notes (draft)
> ==
>
> Updates since v2.26
> ---
>
> Backward compatibility notes
Is it worth mentioning here the reversion of v2 as the default protocol?
It does end
6 matches
Mail list logo