Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Zhou Jie wrote: > Hi, Alex > > > On 2016/6/9 23:39, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhou Jie >> wrote: >>> >>> TO Alex >>> TO Michael >>> >>>In your solution you add a

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 8:03 PM, Zhou Jie wrote: > Hi, Alex > > > On 2016/6/9 23:39, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhou Jie >> wrote: >>> >>> TO Alex >>> TO Michael >>> >>>In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as >>>a bridge between direct

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

Hi, Alex On 2016/6/9 23:39, Alexander Duyck wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhou Jie wrote: TO Alex TO Michael In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as a bridge between direct assigned devices and the host bridge. Do you mean put all

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

Hi, Alex On 2016/6/9 23:39, Alexander Duyck wrote: On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhou Jie wrote: TO Alex TO Michael In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as a bridge between direct assigned devices and the host bridge. Do you mean put all direct assigned devices to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhou Jie wrote: > TO Alex > TO Michael > >In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as >a bridge between direct assigned devices and the host bridge. >Do you mean put all direct assigned devices to >one emulate

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Zhou Jie wrote: > TO Alex > TO Michael > >In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as >a bridge between direct assigned devices and the host bridge. >Do you mean put all direct assigned devices to >one emulate PCI bridge? >If yes,

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

TO Alex TO Michael In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as a bridge between direct assigned devices and the host bridge. Do you mean put all direct assigned devices to one emulate PCI bridge? If yes, this maybe bring some problems. We are writing a patchset to

Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

TO Alex TO Michael In your solution you add a emulate PCI bridge to act as a bridge between direct assigned devices and the host bridge. Do you mean put all direct assigned devices to one emulate PCI bridge? If yes, this maybe bring some problems. We are writing a patchset to

Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Zhou Jie wrote: > Hi Alex, > > > On 2016/1/6 0:18, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:11:25PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >>

Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 2:18 AM, Zhou Jie wrote: > Hi Alex, > > > On 2016/1/6 0:18, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:11:25PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: >> >> The two mechanisms referenced above

Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

Hi Alex, On 2016/1/6 0:18, Alexander Duyck wrote: On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:11:25PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: The two mechanisms referenced above would likely require coordination with QEMU and as such are open

Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/3] x86: Add support for guest DMA dirty page tracking

Hi Alex, On 2016/1/6 0:18, Alexander Duyck wrote: On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 07:11:25PM -0800, Alexander Duyck wrote: The two mechanisms referenced above would likely require coordination with QEMU and as such are open to discussion. I