(2013/08/28 23:42), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:30:17 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
(2013/08/27 22:05), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
OK, let me check that. Even if the old server will receive "V2", the
server will send
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:30:17 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> (2013/08/27 22:05), Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
> > Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> >
> >> OK, let me check that. Even if the old server will receive "V2", the
> >> server will send port numbers instead of
(2013/08/27 22:05), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
OK, let me check that. Even if the old server will receive "V2", the
server will send port numbers instead of "V2" due to the old protocol.
In that time, the new client will disconnect from
(2013/08/27 22:05), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
OK, let me check that. Even if the old server will receive V2, the
server will send port numbers instead of V2 due to the old protocol.
In that time, the new
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:30:17 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
(2013/08/27 22:05), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
OK, let me check that. Even if the old server will receive
(2013/08/28 23:42), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 20:30:17 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
(2013/08/27 22:05), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
OK, let me check
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> OK, let me check that. Even if the old server will receive "V2", the
> server will send port numbers instead of "V2" due to the old protocol.
> In that time, the new client will disconnect from the old server and
> the restarts with
(2013/08/27 0:11), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:50:33 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
0. old server and old client
Old servers send "tracecmd" as the first message.
Old clients compare the first 8byte of the first message with "tracecmd".
1. new server
- Send "tracecmd-v2" as
(2013/08/27 0:11), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:50:33 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
Network
0. old server and old client
Old servers send tracecmd as the first message.
Old clients compare the first 8byte of the first message with tracecmd.
1.
On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 19:23:24 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
OK, let me check that. Even if the old server will receive V2, the
server will send port numbers instead of V2 due to the old protocol.
In that time, the new client will disconnect from the old server
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:50:33 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
>
> 0. old server and old client
> Old servers send "tracecmd" as the first message.
> Old clients compare the first 8byte of the first message with "tracecmd".
>
> 1. new server
> - Send "tracecmd-v2" as the first message.
> - Check
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 10:50:33 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
Network
0. old server and old client
Old servers send tracecmd as the first message.
Old clients compare the first 8byte of the first message with tracecmd.
1. new server
- Send tracecmd-v2 as
(2013/08/21 2:56), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:46:39 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
This message protocol is incompatible with the previous unstructured message
protocol. So, if an old(new)-version client tries to connect to an
new(old)-version server, the operation should
(2013/08/21 2:56), Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:46:39 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
This message protocol is incompatible with the previous unstructured message
protocol. So, if an old(new)-version client tries to connect to an
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:46:39 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE wrote:
> This message protocol is incompatible with the previous unstructured message
> protocol. So, if an old(new)-version client tries to connect to an
> new(old)-version server, the operation should be stopped.
>
I'm a stickler for
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 18:46:39 +0900
Yoshihiro YUNOMAE yoshihiro.yunomae...@hitachi.com wrote:
This message protocol is incompatible with the previous unstructured message
protocol. So, if an old(new)-version client tries to connect to an
new(old)-version server, the operation should be
16 matches
Mail list logo
