How are you? I'm Vanina C. I picked interest in you and I would like to know
more about you and establish relationship with you. i will wait for your
response. thank you.
uct nlattr
*nla_zone_limit,
static int ovs_ct_limit_get_default_limit(struct ovs_ct_limit_info *info,
struct sk_buff *reply)
{
- struct ovs_zone_limit zone_limit;
-
- zone_limit.zone_id = OVS_ZONE_LIMIT_DEFAULT_ZONE;
- zone_limit.li
From: Antoine Tenart
[ Upstream commit 68c1a943ef37bafde5ea2383e8ca224c7169ee31 ]
When the interface is part of a bridge or an Open vSwitch port and a
packet exceed a PMTU estimate, an ICMP reply is sent to the sender. When
using the external mode (collect metadata) the source and destination
From: Antoine Tenart
[ Upstream commit 30a93d2b7d5a7cbb53ac19c9364a256d1aa6c08a ]
When the interface is part of a bridge or an Open vSwitch port and a
packet exceed a PMTU estimate, an ICMP reply is sent to the sender. When
using the external mode (collect metadata) the source and destination
uct nlattr
*nla_zone_limit,
static int ovs_ct_limit_get_default_limit(struct ovs_ct_limit_info *info,
struct sk_buff *reply)
{
- struct ovs_zone_limit zone_limit;
-
- zone_limit.zone_id = OVS_ZONE_LIMIT_DEFAULT_ZONE;
- zone_limit.li
From: Antoine Tenart
[ Upstream commit 68c1a943ef37bafde5ea2383e8ca224c7169ee31 ]
When the interface is part of a bridge or an Open vSwitch port and a
packet exceed a PMTU estimate, an ICMP reply is sent to the sender. When
using the external mode (collect metadata) the source and destination
From: Antoine Tenart
[ Upstream commit 30a93d2b7d5a7cbb53ac19c9364a256d1aa6c08a ]
When the interface is part of a bridge or an Open vSwitch port and a
packet exceed a PMTU estimate, an ICMP reply is sent to the sender. When
using the external mode (collect metadata) the source and destination
uct nlattr
*nla_zone_limit,
static int ovs_ct_limit_get_default_limit(struct ovs_ct_limit_info *info,
struct sk_buff *reply)
{
- struct ovs_zone_limit zone_limit;
-
- zone_limit.zone_id = OVS_ZONE_LIMIT_DEFAULT_ZONE;
- zone_limit.li
Marco!
On Wed, Apr 07 2021 at 11:32, Marco Faltelli wrote:
> Current sleep services (nanosleep) provide sleep periods very far from
> the expectations when scheuling microsecond-scale timers. On our
> testbed, using rdtscp() before and after a nanosleep() syscall to
> measure the effective
Current sleep services (nanosleep) provide sleep periods very far from the
expectations when scheuling microsecond-scale timers. On our testbed, using
rdtscp() before and after a nanosleep() syscall to measure the effective
elapsed time with a 1us timer, we got ~59us.
Even with larger timeout
eing sent to userspace.
>
> Fix that by using designated initializer that will clear all
> non-specified fields.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] openvswitch: fix send of uninitialized stack memory in ct limit reply
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/4d514
rack.c
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
> > @@ -2032,10 +2032,10 @@ static int ovs_ct_limit_del_zone_limit(struct
> > nlattr *nla_zone_limit,
> > static int ovs_ct_limit_get_default_limit(struct ovs_ct_limit_info *info,
> >
nla_zone_limit,
> static int ovs_ct_limit_get_default_limit(struct ovs_ct_limit_info *info,
> struct sk_buff *reply)
> {
> - struct ovs_zone_limit zone_limit;
> -
> - zone_limit.zone_id = OVS_ZONE_LIMIT_DEFAULT_ZONE;
>
--- a/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
+++ b/net/openvswitch/conntrack.c
@@ -2032,10 +2032,10 @@ static int ovs_ct_limit_del_zone_limit(struct nlattr
*nla_zone_limit,
static int ovs_ct_limit_get_default_limit(struct ovs_ct_limit_info *info,
struct sk_buff *reply)
{
-
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regards
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regards
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
/* To only be set on reply */
int ret;
@@ -1064,14 +1066,35 @@ static u64 seccomp_next_notify_id(struct seccomp_filter
*filter)
return filter->notif->next_id++;
}
-static void seccomp_handle_addfd(struct seccomp_kaddfd *addfd)
+static void seccomp_handle_addfd(struc
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
From: Frank Sorenson
[ Upstream commit ad3dbe35c833c2d4d0bbf3f04c785d32f931e7c9 ]
CREATE requests return a post_op_fh3, rather than nfs_fh3. The
post_op_fh3 includes an extra word to indicate 'handle_follows'.
Without that additional word, create fails when full 64-byte
filehandles are in use.
Dear Friend,
Greetings!
How are you with your family today? I hope both of you are in good
health decently, I know that this message might meet you in utmost
surprise as we never know each other before. I am Mr. Dabire Basole a
banker by profession, I need your urgent assist in transferring the
FROM MR. DABIRE BASOLE
AUDIT & ACCOUNT MANAGER
BANK OF AFRICA (B.O.A)
OUAGADOUGOU BURKINA FASO
WEST AFRICA.
Dear Friend,
With due respect, I have decided to contact you on a business
transaction that will be beneficial to both of us. At the bank last
account and auditing evaluation, my staffs
Dear Friend,
Greetings!
How are you with your family today? I hope both of you are in good
health decently, I know that this message might meet you in utmost
surprise as we never know each other before. I am Mr. Dabire Basole a
banker by profession, I need your urgent assist in transferring the
+void ls7a_mm_wreg_locked(struct loongson_device *ldev, u32 offset,
u32 val)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(ldev-mmio_lock, flags);
+ writel(val, ldev-mmio + offset);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(ldev-mmio_lock, flags);
+}
Why lock and disable
Dear Friend,
Greetings!
How are you with your family today? I hope both of you are in good
health decently, I know that this message might meet you in utmost
surprise as we never know each other before. I am Mr. Dabire Basole a
banker by profession, I need your urgent assist in transferring the
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regards
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
On 12.02.21 11:14, David Hildenbrand wrote:
On 11.02.21 19:20, Adithya Chandrakasan wrote:
On 2/11/21 2:36 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
^
Please create proper patch subjects. Nobody has a glue what you are doing when
looking at the subject.
"mm/util: fix ??? warning"
Which raises the
On 11.02.21 19:20, Adithya Chandrakasan wrote:
On 2/11/21 2:36 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
^
Please create proper patch subjects. Nobody has a glue what you are doing when
looking at the subject.
"mm/util: fix ??? warning"
Which raises the question, what is ???
Compiler? static code
On 2/11/21 2:36 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> ^
>
> Please create proper patch subjects. Nobody has a glue what you are doing
> when looking at the subject.
>
> "mm/util: fix ??? warning"
>
> Which raises the question, what is ???
>
> Compiler? static code checker? ... ?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> On
^
Please create proper patch subjects. Nobody has a glue what you are
doing when looking at the subject.
"mm/util: fix ??? warning"
Which raises the question, what is ???
Compiler? static code checker? ... ?
Thanks
On 11.02.21 08:29, Adithya Chandrakasan wrote:
FILE: mm/util.c:930:
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regard,
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
From: Hangbin Liu
commit 2efdaaaf883a143061296467913c01aa1ff4b3ce upstream.
Based on RFC 8200, Section 4.5 Fragment Header:
- If the first fragment does not include all headers through an
Upper-Layer header, then that fragment should be discarded and
an ICMP Parameter Problem,
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 05:24:52PM +0530, Aviraj CJ wrote:
> From: Hangbin Liu
>
> commit 2efdaaaf883a143061296467913c01aa1ff4b3ce upstream.
>
> Based on RFC 8200, Section 4.5 Fragment Header:
>
> - If the first fragment does not include all headers through an
> Upper-Layer header,
From: Hangbin Liu
commit 2efdaaaf883a143061296467913c01aa1ff4b3ce upstream.
Based on RFC 8200, Section 4.5 Fragment Header:
- If the first fragment does not include all headers through an
Upper-Layer header, then that fragment should be discarded and
an ICMP Parameter Problem,
From: Hangbin Liu
commit 2efdaaaf883a143061296467913c01aa1ff4b3ce upstream.
Based on RFC 8200, Section 4.5 Fragment Header:
- If the first fragment does not include all headers through an
Upper-Layer header, then that fragment should be discarded and
an ICMP Parameter Problem,
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 13:02:31 -0800
Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Instead of IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, we can also use IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL
> right for the raw values for min/max range and resolution? But, to
Sure on IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL, that should be fine.
> keep things simple though,
Hi Jonathan,
Instead of IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO, we can also use IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL
right for the raw values for min/max range and resolution? But, to
keep things simple though, it will be nice if the IIO driver uses
IIO_VAL_INT and throws an error if there is a negative exponent in the
following
On Sat, 16 Jan 2021 23:15:56 -0800
Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Can you clarify one thing ? If we go with option 2 which is using
> IIO_AVAIL_RANGE for min,step,high using IIO_VAL_INT then how will it
> ensure the possible floating value for step as we are using int type?
As you've
Hi Jonathan,
Can you clarify one thing ? If we go with option 2 which is using
IIO_AVAIL_RANGE for min,step,high using IIO_VAL_INT then how will it
ensure the possible floating value for step as we are using int type?
Thanks,
Jyoti
On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 11:33 AM Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
>
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:17:51 -0800
Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> I know it is a bit confusing. Let me try to explain it with some
> examples to hopefully clarify some things here.
> SCMI Platform talks to the native/actual sensor, gets the raw values
> from the native sensor and
Hi Jonathan,
I know it is a bit confusing. Let me try to explain it with some
examples to hopefully clarify some things here.
SCMI Platform talks to the native/actual sensor, gets the raw values
from the native sensor and applies the scale and then sends those
values to the SCMI agent and the
On Sun, 10 Jan 2021 22:44:44 -0800
Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> In section 4.7.2.5.1 of the specification, the following exponent is
> the scale value
>
> uint32 axis_attributes_high
> Bits[15:11] Exponent: The power-of-10 multiplier in two’s-complement
> format that is applied to
Hi Jonathan,
In section 4.7.2.5.1 of the specification, the following exponent is
the scale value
uint32 axis_attributes_high
Bits[15:11] Exponent: The power-of-10 multiplier in two’s-complement
format that is applied to the sensor unit
specified by the SensorType field.
and the resolution is
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:23:53 +
Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> Instead of adding IIO_VAL_INT_H32_L32, I am thinking of adding
> IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LONG
> or IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_64 as the scale/exponent used for min/max range can be
> different
> than the one used in resolution
Hi Jonathan,
Instead of adding IIO_VAL_INT_H32_L32, I am thinking of adding
IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_LONG
or IIO_VAL_FRACTIONAL_64 as the scale/exponent used for min/max range can be
different
than the one used in resolution according to specification.
I am planning to use read_avail for
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 02:36:45PM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:26:59 +
> Cristian Marussi wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:29:17AM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:09:20 +
> > > Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 11:26:59 +
Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:29:17AM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:09:20 +
> > Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jonathan,
> > >
> > > > So, sensor_max_range can effectively be exposed as a
Hi
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:29:17AM +, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:09:20 +
> Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
>
> > Hi Jonathan,
> >
> > > So, sensor_max_range can effectively be exposed as a combination of
> > > scale and the *_raw_avail for a raw read (via the read_avail
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 23:09:20 +
Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
> Hi Jonathan,
>
> > So, sensor_max_range can effectively be exposed as a combination of
> > scale and the *_raw_avail for a raw read (via the read_avail callback in
> > IIO).
> > We'll ignore the fact the interface assumes a single value
Hi Jonathan,
> So, sensor_max_range can effectively be exposed as a combination of
> scale and the *_raw_avail for a raw read (via the read_avail callback in IIO).
> We'll ignore the fact the interface assumes a single value (so I assume
> symmetric?)
Based on the SCMI specification the sensor
de_getdeviceinfo(xdr, args, );
- /* set up reply kvec. Subtract notification bitmap max size (2)
-* so that notification bitmap is put in xdr_buf tail */
+ /* set up reply kvec. device_addr4 opaque data is read into the
+* pages */
rpc_prepare_reply_pages(req, a
de_getdeviceinfo(xdr, args, );
- /* set up reply kvec. Subtract notification bitmap max size (2)
-* so that notification bitmap is put in xdr_buf tail */
+ /* set up reply kvec. device_addr4 opaque data is read into the
+* pages */
rpc_prepare_reply_pages(req, a
From: Finn Thain
[ Upstream commit 2c9cfbadfa234b03473f1ef54e6f4772cc07a371 ]
A recent patch incorrectly altered the adb-iop state machine behaviour
and introduced a regression that can appear intermittently as a
malfunctioning ADB input device. This seems to be caused when reply
packets from
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regards
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
Attn: Beneficiary:
Congratulations!! Your payment has been approved and endorsed, with the
instruction and approvals are given from the Authorities Due to the
incessant scam activities going around the globe, the Authorities has
instructed our Financial Institution to use high Performance in
transaction.
Reply to this mail for more information about this business transaction:
galvan.joh...@outlook.com
Regards,
Mr. John Galvan
On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 07:53:57AM +0100, Michał Mirosław wrote:
> From: Dmitry Osipenko
>
> eKTF3624 touchscreen firmware uses two variants of the reply opcodes for
> reporting touch events: one is 0x63 (used by older firmware) and other is
> 0x66 (used by newer firmware). T
From: Dmitry Osipenko
eKTF3624 touchscreen firmware uses two variants of the reply opcodes for
reporting touch events: one is 0x63 (used by older firmware) and other is
0x66 (used by newer firmware). The 0x66 variant is equal to 0x63 of
eKTH3500, while 0x63 needs small adjustment of the touch
FROM MR. ABDUL KARIM
AUDIT & ACCOUNT MANAGER
BANK OF AFRICA (B.O.A)
OUAGADOUGOU BURKINA FASO
WEST AFRICA.
Greeting My Dear Friend,
With due respect, I have decided to contact you on a business
transaction that will be beneficial to both of us. At the bank last
account and auditing evaluation, my
unctioning ADB input device. This seems to be caused when reply
> > packets from different ADB commands become mixed up, especially during
> > the adb bus scan. Fix this by unconditionally entering the awaiting_reply
> > state after sending an explicit command, even when the ADB co
--
Greetings and best compliment of the day, am contacting you
independently of my investigation in my bank and no one is informed of
this communication. I need your urgent assistance in transferring the
sum of $13.5million dollars to your private account, that belongs to
one of our late
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regard,
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
Hi Finn,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 5:54 AM Finn Thain wrote:
> A recent patch incorrectly altered the adb-iop state machine behaviour
> and introduced a regression that can appear intermittently as a
> malfunctioning ADB input device. This seems to be caused when reply
> packets from d
--
Good-Day Friend,
I know that this letter will come to you as surprise, I got your
contact address while am searching for foreign partner to assist me in
this business transaction that is present in our favor, My name is Mr.
KARIM ZAKARI, I am the Bill and Exchange (assistant) Manager
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regards
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
I'm Dailborh R. from US. I picked interest in you and I would like to know
more about you and establish relationship with you. i will wait for
your response. thank you.
FROM MR. ABDUL KARIM
AUDIT & ACCOUNT MANAGER
BANK OF AFRICA (B.O.A)
OUAGADOUGOU BURKINA FASO
WEST AFRICA.
Greeting My Dear Friend,
With due respect, I have decided to contact you on a business
transaction that will be beneficial to both of us. At the bank last
account and auditing evaluation, my
A recent patch incorrectly altered the adb-iop state machine behaviour
and introduced a regression that can appear intermittently as a
malfunctioning ADB input device. This seems to be caused when reply
packets from different ADB commands become mixed up, especially during
the adb bus scan. Fix
y. I will appreciate your utmost confidentiality as I
wait for your reply.
Best Regard,
Mrs. Elizabeth Edward
Not even getting a reply after one invested quite a bit of time with
preparing and writing a report can be quite devastating. But when it
comes to Linux, this can easily happen for good or bad reasons. Hence,
use this opportunity to explain why this might happen. Hopefully some
people
From: Dmitry Osipenko
eKTF3624 touchscreen firmware uses two variants of the reply opcodes for
reporting touch events: one is 0x63 (used by older firmware) and other is
0x66 (used by newer firmware). The 0x66 variant is equal to 0x63 of
eKTH3500, while 0x63 needs small adjustment of the touch
We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
SHORT reply happens. Update the error bit handling logic in
ti_sn_aux_transfer() to handle these cases and notify upper layers that
such errors have happened. This helps the retry logic understand that a
timeout has happened
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 6:17 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
> SHORT reply happens. Update the error bit handling logic in
> ti_sn_aux_transfer() to handle these cases and notify upper layers that
> such error
We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
SHORT reply happens. Update the error bit handling logic in
ti_sn_aux_transfer() to handle these cases and notify upper layers that
such errors have happened. This helps the retry logic understand that a
timeout has happened
Quoting Doug Anderson (2020-10-29 09:22:55)
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:12 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
> > SHORT reply happens.
>
> I don't think you update the "reply"
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 6:12 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
> SHORT reply happens.
I don't think you update the "reply" field for SHORT, right? You just
return a different size?
> Update the er
We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a
SHORT reply happens. Update the error bit handling logic in
ti_sn_aux_transfer() to handle these cases and notify upper layers that
such errors have happened. This helps the retry logic understand that a
timeout has happened
From: Dmitry Osipenko
eKTF3624 touchscreen firmware uses two variants of the reply opcodes for
reporting touch events: one is 0x63 (used by older firmware) and other is
0x66 (used by newer firmware). The 0x66 variant is equal to 0x63 of
eKTH3500, while 0x63 needs small adjustment of the touch
Hello,
I hope this email meets you in good health, My names are Osman Jalloh and I am
from Sierra Leone, I
have some kilos of gold which I inherited from my late parents and I will like
to
ship it out to overseas for investment, I need a partner
who can receive the gold and make
arrangement for
--
Hi friend
I am a banker in ADB BANK. I want to transfer an abandoned sum of
USD15.6Million to your Bank account. 40/percent will be your share.
No risk involved but keeps it as secret. Contact me for more details.
Please reply me through my alternative email id only (salif.musa
Assalamu alaikum
My name is Mr. Mohamed Musa, I am a staff working with the Bank Of
Africa here in Ouagadougou,Burkina Faso.
I want you to help me in receiving the sum of Twenty Seven Million Two
Hundred thousand Dollars ($27,200,000) into your Bank Account. This
fund was deposited in the bank
Just like for MASQ, inspect the reply packets coming from DR/TUN
real servers and alter the connection's state and timeout
according to the protocol.
It's ipvs's duty to do traffic statistic if packets get hit,
no matter what mode it is.
---
Changes in v1: support DR/TUN mode statistic
Changes
Many thx for you comments. Consider all the obvious spelling and
grammatical mistakes you pointed out fixed, I won't mention all of them
in this reply to keep things easier to follow.
Am 04.10.20 um 06:03 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On 10/1/20 1:50 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> +se
On 10/1/20 1:50 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Not even getting a reply after one invested quite a bit of time with
> preparing and writing a report can be quite devastating. But when it
> comes to Linux, this can easily happen for good or bad reasons. Hence,
> use this opportunity to
to treat it with strictest confidence, on our acceptance please
send to me your personal details and your direct mobile phone number for speedy
correspondence.
I am looking forward to doing business with you. Your prompt reply will be
highly appreciated. Do kindly furnish me with your contact
Not even getting a reply after one invested quite a bit of time with
preparing and writing a report can be quite devastating. But when it
comes to Linux, this can easily happen for good or bad reasons. Hence,
use this opportunity to explain why this might happen, hopefully some
people
I am very happy to contact you for this business transaction.Please
kindly get back to me via this email: mrchenhk...@gmail.com for us to achieve
success and secure a good future for our families.
From: Dmitry Osipenko
eKTF3624 touchscreen firmware uses two variants of the reply opcodes for
reporting touch events: one is 0x63 (used by older firmware) and other is
0x66 (used by newer firmware). The 0x66 variant is equal to 0x63 of
eKTH3500, while 0x63 needs small adjustment of the touch
tunnel info request reached mainline in 5.9 merge window, we should
> still be able to fix the reply message type without breaking backward
> compatibility.
>
> Fixes: c7d759eb7b12 ("ethtool: add tunnel info interface")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Kubecek
Applied, thank you.
1 - 100 of 1084 matches
Mail list logo
