Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-04 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:42:12 +0800 "Mao Rui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hmm... Does anybody own this bug? No hardware so its really up to someone with hardware to fix. I have a long list of things to sort out which affect more than one person and for which I do posess hardware so its priority

Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-04 Thread Alan Cox
On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:42:12 +0800 Mao Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... Does anybody own this bug? No hardware so its really up to someone with hardware to fix. I have a long list of things to sort out which affect more than one person and for which I do posess hardware so its priority is

Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-02 Thread Tejun Heo
Mao Rui wrote: > Hi, > > No difference... :-( > > Here is the log. > > [ 26.729011] scsi0 : ata_piix > [ 26.729067] scsi1 : ata_piix > [ 26.729095] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1880 ctl 0x1874 bmdma 0x1860 > irq 18 > [ 26.729097] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1878 ctl 0x1870 bmdma

RE: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-02 Thread Mao Rui
an Cox'; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module > > Mao Rui wrote: > > I tried to nail down when the problem was introduced. I compiled some > > official kernel release. Here is the result. > > 2.6.17.14 IDE -- Failed SATA -- pa

Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-02 Thread Tejun Heo
Mao Rui wrote: > I tried to nail down when the problem was introduced. I compiled some > official kernel release. Here is the result. > 2.6.17.14 IDE -- Failed SATA -- passed > 2.6.18 IDE -- Failed SATA -- failed > 2.6.18.8 IDE -- Failed SATA -- failed > 2.6.24-rc7-git6 IDE -- passed

Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-02 Thread Tejun Heo
Mao Rui wrote: I tried to nail down when the problem was introduced. I compiled some official kernel release. Here is the result. 2.6.17.14 IDE -- Failed SATA -- passed 2.6.18 IDE -- Failed SATA -- failed 2.6.18.8 IDE -- Failed SATA -- failed 2.6.24-rc7-git6 IDE -- passed SATA

RE: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-02 Thread Mao Rui
Subject: Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module Mao Rui wrote: I tried to nail down when the problem was introduced. I compiled some official kernel release. Here is the result. 2.6.17.14 IDE -- Failed SATA -- passed 2.6.18 IDE -- Failed SATA -- failed 2.6.18.8 IDE

Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-02-02 Thread Tejun Heo
Mao Rui wrote: Hi, No difference... :-( Here is the log. [ 26.729011] scsi0 : ata_piix [ 26.729067] scsi1 : ata_piix [ 26.729095] ata1: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1880 ctl 0x1874 bmdma 0x1860 irq 18 [ 26.729097] ata2: SATA max UDMA/133 cmd 0x1878 ctl 0x1870 bmdma 0x1868 irq 18

RE: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-29 Thread Mao Rui
ginal Message- > > From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2008 7:02 PM > > To: Mao Rui > > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module > > > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:

RE: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-29 Thread Mao Rui
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:25 +0800 Mao Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a PQI Turbo SATA DOM. It works well under Windows. I installed it in a SuperMicro motherboard, Intel 5000P

RE: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-17 Thread Mao Rui
vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module > > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:25 +0800 > "Mao Rui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I have a PQI Turbo SATA DOM. It works well under Windows. I installed

RE: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-17 Thread Mao Rui
Subject: Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:25 +0800 Mao Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a PQI Turbo SATA DOM. It works well under Windows. I installed it in a SuperMicro motherboard, Intel 5000P chipset. The OS is Ubuntu 7.04, kernel

Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-15 Thread Alan Cox
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:25 +0800 "Mao Rui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a PQI Turbo SATA DOM. It works well under Windows. I installed it in > a SuperMicro motherboard, Intel 5000P chipset. The OS is Ubuntu 7.04, kernel > 2.6.20-15. But the DOM is not appeared as a device node,

SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-15 Thread Mao Rui
Hi, I have a PQI Turbo SATA DOM. It works well under Windows. I installed it in a SuperMicro motherboard, Intel 5000P chipset. The OS is Ubuntu 7.04, kernel 2.6.20-15. But the DOM is not appeared as a device node, and I found several error messages in kernel log. [   67.124299] ata2.00: qc

SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-15 Thread Mao Rui
Hi, I have a PQI Turbo SATA DOM. It works well under Windows. I installed it in a SuperMicro motherboard, Intel 5000P chipset. The OS is Ubuntu 7.04, kernel 2.6.20-15. But the DOM is not appeared as a device node, and I found several error messages in kernel log. [   67.124299] ata2.00: qc

Re: SATA DOM is not identified by ata_piix module

2008-01-15 Thread Alan Cox
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 18:11:25 +0800 Mao Rui [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have a PQI Turbo SATA DOM. It works well under Windows. I installed it in a SuperMicro motherboard, Intel 5000P chipset. The OS is Ubuntu 7.04, kernel 2.6.20-15. But the DOM is not appeared as a device node, and I