On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 10:58:49AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> I think this may be a bug in __raid_run_ops that is only possible when
> raid offload and CONFIG_MULTICORE_RAID456 are enabled. I'm thinking
> the descriptor is completed and recycled to another requester in the
> space between these
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Laurent CARON wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:48:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:26:01AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
>> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> > > That's:
>> > >
>> > >
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 02:48:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:26:01AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > That's:
> > >
> > > BUG_ON(async_tx_test_ack(depend_tx) ||
> > > txd_next(de
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:26:01AM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > That's:
> >
> > BUG_ON(async_tx_test_ack(depend_tx) || txd_next(depend_tx)
> > ||
> > txd_parent(tx));
> >
> > but probably th
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 11:03:53AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> That's:
>
> BUG_ON(async_tx_test_ack(depend_tx) || txd_next(depend_tx) ||
> txd_parent(tx));
>
> but probably the b0rkage happens up the stack. And this __raid_run_ops
> is probably starting t
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 09:42:58PM +0200, Laurent CARON wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently replacing an old system (HP DL 380 G5) by new dell R720xd.
> On those new boxes I did configure the H310 controler as plain JBOD.
>
> Those boxes appear to crash more often than not (from 5 mins to a couple
> o
Hi,
I'm currently replacing an old system (HP DL 380 G5) by new dell R720xd.
On those new boxes I did configure the H310 controler as plain JBOD.
Those boxes appear to crash more often than not (from 5 mins to a couple
of hours).
I have the impression those crashes appear under heavy IO.
The set
7 matches
Mail list logo